2012
DOI: 10.4161/hv.19712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can growth inhibition assays (GIA) predict blood-stage malaria vaccine efficacy?

Abstract: An effective vaccine against P. falciparum malaria remains a global health priority. Blood-stage vaccines are an important component of this effort, with some indications of recent progress. However only a fraction of potential blood-stage antigens have been tested, highlighting a critical need for efficient down-selection strategies. Functional in vitro assays such as the growth/invasion inhibition assays (GiA) are widely used, but it is unclear whether GiA activity correlates with protection or predicts vacc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
72
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
2
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While a measure of antibody function would be valuable, the lack of robust assays has limited the inclusion of functional antibody measures to assess the contribution of antibody quality to immunity. The growth inhibition assay has yielded inconsistent results with respect to the role of growth inhibitory antibodies in protection (11,55,56). More recently, opsonic phagocytosis assays (14) and neutrophil-based antibody-dependent respiratory burst assays (13) have been developed and applied to a limited number of cohort studies with results suggesting that these assays may function as correlates of immunity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a measure of antibody function would be valuable, the lack of robust assays has limited the inclusion of functional antibody measures to assess the contribution of antibody quality to immunity. The growth inhibition assay has yielded inconsistent results with respect to the role of growth inhibitory antibodies in protection (11,55,56). More recently, opsonic phagocytosis assays (14) and neutrophil-based antibody-dependent respiratory burst assays (13) have been developed and applied to a limited number of cohort studies with results suggesting that these assays may function as correlates of immunity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disappointing results of a number of blood-stage vaccine trials has raised the concern of whether the in vitro invasion inhibition assay or GIA has any correlation with clinical protection or could predict vaccine efficacy in humans (47). Unfortunately, only a few blood-stage antigens have been tested in field efficacy trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the problems cited above, more studies with parasite antigens that induce potent strain-transcending invasion inhibition are thus required to validate the correlation of in vitro invasion-inhibitory activity with clinical protection in humans. It would thus be beneficial to validate the in vitro invasion inhibitory assay or GIA with in vivo controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) studies using either a sporozoite or blood-stage challenge model (47). However, the in vitro invasion-inhibitory assay or GIA remains as the only currently available laboratory assay to measure the functionality of antibodies to inhibit erythrocyte invasion by Plasmodium merozoites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their antigenic targets and protective mechanisms remain unclear, but such information is urgently needed for malaria vaccine development. Correlations between direct growth inhibition of Plasmodium blood stages in vitro, as measured in the GIA, and protection against malaria have been weak and inconsistent (reviewed in reference 16), suggesting that protective antibodies may act via other functional mechanisms. Indeed, recent studies strongly implicated the importance of opsonizing antibodies for naturally acquired immunity…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it remains unclear which antibody mechanisms determine protection against malaria. The direct growth inhibition assay (GIA) of Plasmodium blood stages remains the most commonly used functional assay for blood-stage vaccine candidates and merozoite antigens (15,16), although whether direct growth inhibitory activity in vitro correlates with protection against clinical malaria is controversial (16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%