2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0738-0593(00)00020-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can high stakes national testing improve instruction: reexamining conventional wisdom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
69
0
7

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
5
69
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The study shows that teachers have engaged most effectively with new assessment system when the changes have derived from clearly understood changes in the curriculum. Chapman & Snyder (2000) also argue that the new assessment systems are implemented since it can be effective for improving instructional practice but such a mechanism can fail to understand the conditions that need to be met in order to have the desired impact on teachers' classroom practice. They also argue that teachers can not adjust to the changes in assessment all the time.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study shows that teachers have engaged most effectively with new assessment system when the changes have derived from clearly understood changes in the curriculum. Chapman & Snyder (2000) also argue that the new assessment systems are implemented since it can be effective for improving instructional practice but such a mechanism can fail to understand the conditions that need to be met in order to have the desired impact on teachers' classroom practice. They also argue that teachers can not adjust to the changes in assessment all the time.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chapman and Snyder (2000) stated that "it is not the examination itself that influences teachers' behaviour, but teachers' beliefs about those changes" (p. 462). Bailey (2005) also argues that teachers may have limited power to influence international examinations and high stakes national, but they do have great power to guide the students to learn, to teach them the academic language which they need to do the tasks in target language use situations and how to work with test results and tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a significant body of research exploring the impact of language testing on teachers and classrooms (e.g., Chapman and Snyder, 2000;Cheng, 2005;Qi, 2007) and the socio-political systems surrounding them (e.g., McNamara and Roever, 2006;Shohamy, 2001); however, impact on the "ultimate stakeholder", the individual language learner, has received far less attention (Cheng et al, 2010, p. 222). Additionally, although there is an impressive body of research focused on young adolescent learners in the literature on language teaching and learning (e.g., Guilloteaux and Dörnyei, 2008;Roessingh et al 2005;Swain and Lapkin, 1995), very few studies have focused on these learners in relation to their language assessment environment , as older adolescents, adults, and young English language learners (under 12 years) have tended to occupy researcher interest.…”
Section: Assessment Practices and Adolescent Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%