Can higher employment levels bring down relative income poverty in the EU? Regression-based simulations of the Europe 2020 target

Abstract

At the European level and in most EU member states, higher employment levels are seen as key to better poverty outcomes. What can we expect the actual impact to be, however? Up until now shift-share analysis has been used to estimate the impact of rising employment on relative income poverty. This method has serious limitations. We propose a more sophisticated simulation model that builds on regression-based estimates of employment probabilities and wages. We use this model to estimate the impact on relative income poverty of moving towards the Europe 2020 target of 75 percent of the working-age population in work. Two sensitivity checks are included: giving priority in job allocation to jobless households and imputing low instead of estimated wages. This article shows that employment growth does not necessarily result in lower relative poverty shares, a result that is largely consistent with observed outcomes over the past decade.

Welfare, labour market deregulation and households’ poverty risks: An analysis of the risk of entering poverty at childbirth in different European welfare clusters

“…Despite the average growth in family income, work-family economic conditions are now even more exposed to unemployment, precariousness and carousel careers due to an increase in dual-earner families and the rise in women's/mothers' labour market participation (Keck and Saraceno, 2013). Recent trends towards higher rates of in-work poverty indicate that employment quality is becoming an issue for a growing number of workers OECD, 2011a;Marx et al, 2012).…”

Is the neighbour’s grass greener? Comparing family support in Lithuania and four other New Member States

“…Using a recalculated poverty line means that we maintain the relative character of the poverty line, thus allowing for the potential shift in median income following from changes in the income distribution (see e.g. Marx et al, 2012). In comparison with the poverty line in existing Lithuanian settings (about €216), it decreases by a maximum of 2 percent (Scenario III, Estonia) or increases by a maximum of 5 percent (Scenario II, full implementation of the Czech policies) for different scenarios.…”

Mind the Gap: Net Incomes of Minimum Wage Workers in the EU and the US

“…Further increases in labour force participation will involve drawing into the labour market those with weaker education and work history profiles. Projections indicate that further increases in employment are unlikely in themselves to reduce relative poverty, given current institutional settings and supports (Marx et al, 2012a).…”