2023
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09691-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can home care work be organized to promote health among the workers while maintaining productivity? An investigation into stakeholders’ perspectives on organizational work redesign concepts based on the Goldilocks Work principles

Abstract: Background Due to the aging population, the need for home care services is increasing in most Western countries, including Norway. However, the highly physical nature of this job could contribute to make recruiting and retaining qualified home care workers (HCWs) challenging. This issue may be overcome by adopting the Goldilocks Work principles, aiming at promoting workers’ physical health by determining a “just right” balance between work demands and recovery periods while maintaining producti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 49 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, studies in the USA and Norway reveal discrepancies in assessing working conditions, scheduling and hours, pointing to the need for standardisation of assessment tools, and improved client data and organisational data collection, and communication regarding the organisation of care and the impact on occupational health outcomes ( 259 263 ). Planning tools and work optimisation models can help to assess care plan complexity, revealing congruencies and discrepancies in employee skills and capacity ( 264 266 ) and redesign work so that it supports staff recovery ( 267 ). Other research emphasises reorganisation of care and new roles for societal needs ( 268 , 269 ) as well as building in time to deliver interpersonal sensitivity ( 270 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, studies in the USA and Norway reveal discrepancies in assessing working conditions, scheduling and hours, pointing to the need for standardisation of assessment tools, and improved client data and organisational data collection, and communication regarding the organisation of care and the impact on occupational health outcomes ( 259 263 ). Planning tools and work optimisation models can help to assess care plan complexity, revealing congruencies and discrepancies in employee skills and capacity ( 264 266 ) and redesign work so that it supports staff recovery ( 267 ). Other research emphasises reorganisation of care and new roles for societal needs ( 268 , 269 ) as well as building in time to deliver interpersonal sensitivity ( 270 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%