2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c03321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can “Hot Spots” Be Stable Enough for Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering?

Abstract: Because of the random distribution and nonuniform enhancement of hot spots, surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) usually shows poor spectral reproducibility, which greatly limits its practical applications, especially quantitative SERS detection. Here, we report our finding that the instability of hot spots is also a key limiting factor for the poor spectral reproducibility of SERS. We show that hot spots show a stability threshold to the excitation power, duration, and wavelength. During SERS measurement,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tracking changes in the PL did not provide any obvious indication of a corresponding loss of nanoparticles during the potential step cycle. This suggests that some other alteration of the surface or nanoparticle arrangement, and thereby diminished Raman enhancement, has occurred that remains to be understood. In contrast, the potentiodynamic version of the experiment (Figure S11, see SI for experimental details) performed within the same potential limits suggests, within the sensitivity of the measurement, that the loss in peak area observed for ν­(c(2 × 2) Cl – ) may be a function of the time spent at potentials that yield complete Cl – desorption. Most interestingly, a new P3 mode emerges at potentials below −1.05 V with a broad peak near 205 cm –1 that overlaps with bulk hydride as well as clean surface lattice modes (Figure and Table ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tracking changes in the PL did not provide any obvious indication of a corresponding loss of nanoparticles during the potential step cycle. This suggests that some other alteration of the surface or nanoparticle arrangement, and thereby diminished Raman enhancement, has occurred that remains to be understood. In contrast, the potentiodynamic version of the experiment (Figure S11, see SI for experimental details) performed within the same potential limits suggests, within the sensitivity of the measurement, that the loss in peak area observed for ν­(c(2 × 2) Cl – ) may be a function of the time spent at potentials that yield complete Cl – desorption. Most interestingly, a new P3 mode emerges at potentials below −1.05 V with a broad peak near 205 cm –1 that overlaps with bulk hydride as well as clean surface lattice modes (Figure and Table ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present work investigates the halide adsorption on Cu (100) using a powerful variant of Raman spectroscopy known as shell-isolated nanoparticle enhanced Raman spectroscopy, or SHINERS, that enables the surface chemistry on otherwise Raman-inactive planar single crystal surfaces to be studied. , Specifically, chemically inert, silica-passivated plasmonic active gold nanoparticles are distributed on the flat surface of interest where they serve as antenna to focus the optical laser power for enhanced Raman spectroscopy of species adsorbed within and/or adjacent to the nanoparticle–substrate junction. Attention is given to the potential dependence of halide coverage and the impact of the c(2 × 2) Cl – adlayer on step faceting at positive potentials and c(2 × 2) templating of the adjacent water and hydronium species. At more negative potentials, another phase transition, perhaps hydride formation, is evident, accompanied by the development of another vibrational mode that marks the boundary between Cl – desorption and the onset of significant hydrogen evolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of particular interest is the aggregation of colloidal metal nanoparticles, which provides a high EF. For example, the random aggregation of spherical and complex nanoparticles can lead to the formation of regions with a strongly enhanced electromagnetic field, known as “hot spots” [ 95 ]. When the biomolecule is close to this region, the Raman enhancement increases up to 10 15 orders of magnitude, and a single-molecule detection can be achieved [ 96 ].…”
Section: Application Of Sers and Sers-combined Raman Techniques In The Detection Of Biomoleculesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17,18] Colloidal nanoparticles such as silver (AgNPs) and gold (AuNPs) are commonly used SERS substrates, but use of nanoparticles can cause spectral fluctuations due to their uncontrolled and random aggregation. [19] Recently, a practical way to form reproducible hotspots is proposed by controlled aggregation of colloidal nanoparticles in presence of using inorganic salts such as NaCl, MgSO 4 , and CuSO 4 . [20,21] This method is relatively cost-effective and has a simple process for preparation of SERS substrate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%