2009
DOI: 10.3200/jpft.36.4.162-173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CanRomantic ComedyBe Gay?: Hollywood Romance, Citizenship, and Same-Sex Marriage Panic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Television shows with gay characters can reinforce traditional patriarchal attitudes and function to extend heterosexual male privilege, as Helene Shugart (2003) has asserted. When heterosexual romantic comedies are compared with homosexual ones, Debra Moddelmog (2009, 162) finds that camera techniques and plot narratives stop short of celebrating homosexual desire as legitimate, ensuring that “heterosexuality remains the privileged mode of desire and marriage, the sanctioned form of bonding.” Gay characters are sometimes “neutered” and are produced as heterosexual rather than gay by being coupled and by being portrayed without eroticism. Coupling domesticates sexual beings into “tame” and proper citizens, and helps them appear “appropriately gendered” (Ingraham 1999, 18).…”
Section: Bromance and Postfeminist Masculinitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Television shows with gay characters can reinforce traditional patriarchal attitudes and function to extend heterosexual male privilege, as Helene Shugart (2003) has asserted. When heterosexual romantic comedies are compared with homosexual ones, Debra Moddelmog (2009, 162) finds that camera techniques and plot narratives stop short of celebrating homosexual desire as legitimate, ensuring that “heterosexuality remains the privileged mode of desire and marriage, the sanctioned form of bonding.” Gay characters are sometimes “neutered” and are produced as heterosexual rather than gay by being coupled and by being portrayed without eroticism. Coupling domesticates sexual beings into “tame” and proper citizens, and helps them appear “appropriately gendered” (Ingraham 1999, 18).…”
Section: Bromance and Postfeminist Masculinitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholarship in the field of media and communication largely ignores cross-sex friendships. Researchers have examined media representations of heterosexual romance (Galician, 2003; Galician & Merskin, 2006; Martin & Kazyak, 2009; Shumway, 2003), and studies have traced the depiction of romantic same-sex relationships in popular film and TV (Becker, 2006; Holz Ivory, Gibson, & Ivory, 2009; Moddelmog, 2009). Others have examined the role of the media in depicting same-sex friendships between women (Hollinger, 1998; Winch, 2012) and men (Alberti, 2013; Baker, 2006; Ibson, 2006), but little scholarship that exists considers the depiction of platonic relationships between men and women in the media—a fact which is, perhaps, telling in and of itself.…”
Section: Cross-sex Friendships In the Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%