1991
DOI: 10.2307/256300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Illegal Corporate Behavior Be Predicted? An Event History Analysis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
279
1
5

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 371 publications
(300 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
15
279
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…From the above statistics, sub-hypothesis (2), which states that CWB does not differ signifi cantly with respect to age, is not supported by the fi nding of this study; hence, it is hypothesized that CWB signifi cantly differs between the age-groups of employees in the Nigerian maritime industry. This fi nding corroborates the fi nding of the studies carried out by Baucus and Near (1991) and Martinko, Gundlach, and Douglas (2002). On the other hand, it contradicts the fi nding reported by Paul-Titus (2009) and Uchenna (2013).…”
Section: Testing Of Hypothesessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…From the above statistics, sub-hypothesis (2), which states that CWB does not differ signifi cantly with respect to age, is not supported by the fi nding of this study; hence, it is hypothesized that CWB signifi cantly differs between the age-groups of employees in the Nigerian maritime industry. This fi nding corroborates the fi nding of the studies carried out by Baucus and Near (1991) and Martinko, Gundlach, and Douglas (2002). On the other hand, it contradicts the fi nding reported by Paul-Titus (2009) and Uchenna (2013).…”
Section: Testing Of Hypothesessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…For example, Martin et al (2007) found that when organizations vie with competitors for scarce resources, they experience heightened pressure to succeed and to survive (cf. Baucus and Near 1991).…”
Section: Pressures and Temptationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted in Table 1, our review of the research on workplace crimes revealed that work on "organizational illegality," "corporate crimes," "unethical prosocial behaviors," and "corrupt organizations" (Baucus and Near 1991, Calavita et al 1997, Pinto et al 2008, Szwajkowski 1985, Umphress et al 2010) covers workplace crimes that are carried out with the intention to benefit the organization. For instance, organizational illegality is conceptualized as legally prohibited action that is taken by organizational members primarily on behalf of the organization (Szwajkowski 1985).…”
Section: Pro-organizational Workplace Crimementioning
confidence: 99%