2019
DOI: 10.1111/sjop.12524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can imagined intergroup contact change (internal) dialogues on differences between ingroup and outgroup?

Abstract: Puchalska -Wasyl, M. M. (2019). Can imagined intergroup contact change (internal) dialogues on differences between ingroup and outgroup? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 60, 181-188.Several positive functions have been ascribed to integrative internal dialogues (IDs), which are based on mutual openness to a partner's viewpoint and a readiness to consider his/her arguments in order to potentially modify one's own stance. As the technique of imagined intergroup contact (IIC) favorably influences attitudes tow… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
(83 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method has been employed frequently with student participants reporting increased self-reflection, awareness of self as a member of a social group, knowledge about structural group inequality, perspective taking, and motivation and actions to bridge differences (24). Additionally, Puchalska-Wasyl (25) found that intergroup contact reduced confrontational attitudes and made participants less inclined to gain an advantage over outgroup members, increased mutual openness to different viewpoints, and enhanced readiness to consider the arguments of others. By reducing social distance and encouraging intergroup contact, pipeline programs may be able to the reduce social isolation experienced by URM students.…”
Section: Holistic Review and Admission Processes A Holistic Review Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has been employed frequently with student participants reporting increased self-reflection, awareness of self as a member of a social group, knowledge about structural group inequality, perspective taking, and motivation and actions to bridge differences (24). Additionally, Puchalska-Wasyl (25) found that intergroup contact reduced confrontational attitudes and made participants less inclined to gain an advantage over outgroup members, increased mutual openness to different viewpoints, and enhanced readiness to consider the arguments of others. By reducing social distance and encouraging intergroup contact, pipeline programs may be able to the reduce social isolation experienced by URM students.…”
Section: Holistic Review and Admission Processes A Holistic Review Amentioning
confidence: 99%