2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can imaging modalities diagnose and stage hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis accurately?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
142
1
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 185 publications
(203 reference statements)
1
142
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These include double contrast-enhanced MRI [20], MR elastography [8,21] and diffusion-weighted imaging [8,22]. These techniques' sensitivity for early liver fibrosis, reproducibility and intersite variability have not been well established [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include double contrast-enhanced MRI [20], MR elastography [8,21] and diffusion-weighted imaging [8,22]. These techniques' sensitivity for early liver fibrosis, reproducibility and intersite variability have not been well established [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…USG-based diagnosis of liver cirrhosis can be based on hepatic and extra-hepatic signs, and the accuracy of USG varies across different studies also because of the different parameters examined (Aube et al, 1999). There is no approved score for ultrasonographic diagnosis of cirrhosis, thus in common practice the diagnosis is made at the examining physician's discretion (Bonekamp et al, 2009). In the present study, it was decided on the basis of the authors' experience that the presence of at least three ultrasonographic signs (one of which must be nodular surface of the liver) is reliable for liver cirrhosis diagnosis.…”
Section: Endoscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other procedures, e.g. magnetic resonance elastography for measurement of fibrosis (Bonekamp et al, 2009), are currently inadequately validated or not validated at all, and therefore cannot be recommended. Although liver biopsy is superior to all other investigations with regard to number of relevant parameters assessed and predictive power, it cannot always be recommended as diagnostic method in possible or sufficiently confirmed fatty liver disease.…”
Section: Indication For Biopsymentioning
confidence: 99%