Can Increasing Scale Efficiency Curb Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution?

Abstract

The Chinese government has made great efforts to improve the scale efficiency of land through various measures during recent years, hoping to realize the coordinated developing goal of promoting agricultural benefits and protecting the environment. Statistics show that China’s land scale efficiency has steadily increased, but agricultural nonpoint source (NPS) pollution has also increased, which seems contrary to the expected outcome. Can increasing scale efficiency really curb agricultural NPS pollution? This study uses provincial-level data from China, together with a panel model and spatial econometric model, to investigate the relationship between scale efficiency and agricultural NPS pollution. It is found that the increase of scale efficiency aggravates the agricultural NPS pollution, and the conclusion still holds after considering spatial effect. The results of spatial analysis shows that the agricultural NPS pollution is spatially dependent. Further decomposition of the spatial effect shows that the scale efficiency not only intensifies the local agricultural NPS pollution, but also has a spillover effect (though not statistically significant) on agricultural NPS pollution in the surrounding areas. It is worth noting that financial policy, raising wage income and upgrading industrial structure can effectively curb agricultural NPS pollution in this region and adjacent areas, which also deserves our attention in the control of agricultural NPS pollution. In addition, it is necessary to make financial and fiscal support policies specifically for the governance of agricultural NPS pollution, adjust the distorted prices of input factors such as chemicals and pesticide, and accelerate the transformation of small-sized farmers to family farms, in order to maximize the inhibitory effect of scale efficiency on relieving agricultural NPS pollution.

Knowledge Mapping of Research on Land Use Change and Food Security: A Visual Analysis Using CiteSpace and VOSviewer

“…In addition, facing the problems of land fragmentation, higher agricultural production costs, lower agricultural productivity and lower grain output, most countries in the world have generally used effective measures, promoting moderately intensive land and large-scale production and management to transform and upgrade the agricultural system, to reduce agricultural production costs and to improve agricultural benefits [ 109 ]. Moreover, with the deepening of people’s understanding of environmental pollution and biodiversity [ 110 ], scholars’ attention to agricultural benefits has increased social and ecological benefits from a single economic benefit to emphasis more on the comprehensive benefits of agricultural production [ 111 ].…”

Does energy-environmental efficiency benefit from advanced policy zones? Evidence from national new zones of China

“…Thus, the establishment of national new zones attracts a large concentration of labor, capital, and energy factors, which may contribute to scale efficiency. Many studies find that economic agglomeration and increased scale efficiency contribute to lower energy consumption and reduced pollution emissions (Chen et al 2019;Chen et al 2023;Zhang and Choi 2013), but a few articles suggest that agglomeration may increase pollution (Gao et al 2021). Therefore, there is some potential for establishing national new zones to increase the cities' energy-environmental efficiency by improving the scale efficiency.…”

The Dual Effects of Environmental Regulation and Financial Support for Agriculture on Agricultural Green Development: Spatial Spillover Effects and Spatio-Temporal Heterogeneity

“…(3) Labors' education level (edu): referring to the previous research [38], labors' education level is generally measured by the average number of education years; that is, the average number of education years of the rural population = (illiterate × 1 + number of labor with primary school education × 6 + number of labor with junior middle school education × 9 + number of labor with secondary school education × 12 + number of labor with a junior college education or above × 16)/the total number of labor over six years old. (4) Agricultural scale (scale): referring to the previous research [39], the agricultural scale is denoted as the arable land area (mu/person) of rural households.…”