2014
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2542495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Innovation Help U.S. Manufacturing Firms Escape Import Competition from China?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
61
4
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
13
61
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Chilean firms with higher preliberalization TFPQ, part of which reflects greater innovation ability, showed increased productivity in response to increased competition compared with low-TFPQ firms, which showed a decrease. This is consistent with Hombert and Matray (2018), who show that while rising imports from China led to slower sales growth and lower profitability for U.S. manufacturing firms, these effects are significantly smaller for firms with a larger stock of research and development (R&D), reflecting their ability to differentiate their products. Bloom, Draca, and Van Reenen (2016) similarly find that in sectors more exposed to Chinese imports, job and survival rates fell in firms with low patenting intensity, but firms with high patenting intensity were relatively sheltered.…”
Section: Documenting the Benefits Of Trade Liberalizationsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Chilean firms with higher preliberalization TFPQ, part of which reflects greater innovation ability, showed increased productivity in response to increased competition compared with low-TFPQ firms, which showed a decrease. This is consistent with Hombert and Matray (2018), who show that while rising imports from China led to slower sales growth and lower profitability for U.S. manufacturing firms, these effects are significantly smaller for firms with a larger stock of research and development (R&D), reflecting their ability to differentiate their products. Bloom, Draca, and Van Reenen (2016) similarly find that in sectors more exposed to Chinese imports, job and survival rates fell in firms with low patenting intensity, but firms with high patenting intensity were relatively sheltered.…”
Section: Documenting the Benefits Of Trade Liberalizationsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…There does not seem to be a negative effect of employment‐at‐will exceptions on local labour markets' ability to absorb import shocks, in contrast to what the mechanisms implied by Autor et al. () and Hombert and Matray ().…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Hirsch () states that while unions do not have a significant effect on productivity, unions tend to reduce R&D, investment and profitability. This is interesting given recent research by Hombert and Matray (), who find that firms who had exogenously higher amounts of R&D downsized much less than firms with lower R&D levels as a response to Chinese import competition. States with higher union density can therefore also translate into higher impacts on economic outcomes from import shocks.…”
Section: Data and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prior evidence, including Autor, Dorn, and Hanson (), Acemoglu et al. (), and Hombert and Matray (), suggests that U.S. firms responded negatively to this event. In Internet Appendix Table IA.III, we run a series of industry‐level cross‐sectional regressions assessing the effect of SC on the change in U.S. imports from China, U.S. exports to China, U.S. net imports from China, and U.S. employment, output, and value added between 2000 and 2007.…”
Section: Measuring the Globalization Risk Premiummentioning
confidence: 95%