“…The percentage response/consent rate was reported in less than half of the articles (Bilszta et al, 2010;Chaudron et al, 2001;Coble et al, 1994;Dennis and Ross, 2005;Dorheim et al, 2014Dorheim et al, , 2009aDorheim et al, , 2009bKhazaie et al, 2013;Mead-Bennett, 1990;Okun et al, 2009Okun et al, , 2011Piteo et al, 2013;Wilkie and Shapiro, 1992) and many did not use representative samples (Bilszta et al, 2010;Calcagni et al, 2012;Chaudron et al, 2001;Coble et al, 1994;Dorheim et al, 2014Dorheim et al, , 2009bFrank et al, 1987;Lee and Kimble, 2009;Piteo et al, 2013;Posmontier, 2008;Swain et al, 1997;Swanson et al, 2013Swanson et al, , 2011Tsai and Thomas, 2012) or did not provide sufficient information to rate representativeness (Godfroid et al, 1997;Goyal et al, 2009Goyal et al, , 2007Okun et al, 2009Okun et al, , 2011. Outcome assessments were generally well performed, although their timing was irregular or unclear in some cases.…”