2008
DOI: 10.1108/00251740810911975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can intuitive and analytical decision styles explain managers' evaluation of information technology?

Abstract: Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to clarify how IT managers' decision styles affect their evaluation of information technology. Design/methodology/approach – Four different decision styles were assessed in a leadership test directed towards IT managers. Each style included two dimensions: confidence judgment ability and decision heuristic usage. Participants belonging to each style were interviewed and their answers analysed with regard to their reasoning about central areas of IT management. Findings – … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some sense, this evidence confirms Simon’s claim: “The effective manager does not have the luxury of choosing between ‘analytic’ and ‘intuitive’ approaches to problems” (Simon, 1987, p. 63). Besides, the empirical results of this study support previous evidence from more qualitative studies suggesting that effective decision-making stems from the combination of intuitive and analytic information-processing styles (Selart et al , 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In some sense, this evidence confirms Simon’s claim: “The effective manager does not have the luxury of choosing between ‘analytic’ and ‘intuitive’ approaches to problems” (Simon, 1987, p. 63). Besides, the empirical results of this study support previous evidence from more qualitative studies suggesting that effective decision-making stems from the combination of intuitive and analytic information-processing styles (Selart et al , 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…On the one hand, they have analyzed the consequences of the IT implementation in terms of costs and benefits (although the level of detail may vary). On the other hand, they could overestimate the positive impact, because not all potential improvements might be realized or they merely want to justify the implementation of something which they want subjectively (see Lovallo and Kahneman, 2003;Selart et al, 2008). Looking at our results, we observe that realized investments are rated equally valuable to planned IT implementations at a significance level of 0.01.…”
Section: Validity Analysismentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Information technology applications have significantly changed the business models of transport and logistics companies (Shen, 2009). There is a need for research that addresses how the decision style of information technology managers are influenced by their evaluation of information technology in the daily business life (Selart, Johansen, Holmesland, & Gronhaug, 2008). Since good decisions obviously underlie planning and just about everything we do, this study focuses on making decisions.…”
Section: Purpose and Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%