2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10560-022-00864-2
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Involuntary Youth Transport into Outdoor Behavioral Healthcare Treatment Programs (Wilderness Therapy) Ever Be Ethical?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Trundle and Hutchinson (2021) potentially also had involuntary participants given they were in residential care. Due to the human rights concerns mentioned earlier and raised by Harper (2017) and Magnuson et al (2022), the nature of youth involvement in these research articles is worth noting when reading these findings.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Trundle and Hutchinson (2021) potentially also had involuntary participants given they were in residential care. Due to the human rights concerns mentioned earlier and raised by Harper (2017) and Magnuson et al (2022), the nature of youth involvement in these research articles is worth noting when reading these findings.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Combs et al (2016) WT program was noted as having 60% involuntary participants, according to Combs post (2015) which remains on the programs website. This is frequent for WT (Magnuson et al, 2022). It was not reported whether Johnson's study participants were involuntary despite the program reportedly accepting involuntary participants (Sawyer, 2023).…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The programs are not inherently based on delinquent behavior and therefore are not part of the criminal or juvenile justice system. This distinction means that enrollment is not dependent on court orders or legal sanctions, but is determined by an attendee’s legal guardian (Chatfield, 2019; Magnuson et al, 2024; Tucker et al, 2015). As a result, participants may attend due to an inability to meet the expectations of their family, such as insufficient grades, perceived “poor attitude,” style of dress, or sexual orientation (Golightley, 2020; Mooney & Leighton, 2019).…”
Section: Behavioral Modification Residential Treatment Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, parents sign over temporary guardianship to the program to allow for this transport (Robbins, 2014; Tucker et al, 2015). Moreover, one frequent claim of attendees is that residents are isolated upon arrival and must earn back the ability to communicate with their families (Chatfield, 2019; Magnuson et al, 2024). Attendees are not allowed to leave campus, communicate with family members or friends, or communicate with prior school attendees following their exit (Golightley, 2020; Pinto, 2007).…”
Section: Behavioral Modification Residential Treatment Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%