Can large-scale land acquisition deals improve livelihoods and lift people out of poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa? Empirical evidence from Tanzania

Abstract

The recent wave of large-scale land acquisitions or land deals, popularly called ‘land grabbing’ in subSaharan Africa, has provoked vigorous debate over the potential benefits and risks to local people, with results structured by complex policy and institu­tional context. Land deals present new develop­ment challenges and aggravate old vulnera­bilities, raising critical questions for investigation. Yet empirical evidence of impacts on local populations is limited, particularly regarding how land deals affect local people’s livelihood assets, strategies, and outcomes. Guided by the sustainable livelihood approach and a quasi-experimental design, I compare livelihoods before and after a land deal project and between an affected and a control community in southwestern Tanzania. I use household surveys, focused group discussions, and key informant interviews to collect data. The ANOVA analyses revealed that the project severely deterio­rated households’ natural, financial, and social capital and had far-reaching impacts on well-being in the affected community compared to the control village. The study recommends that African countries should consider (1) scrutinizing land deals and enforcing contracts, (2) conducting rigorous envi­ron­mental and social impact assess­ment, (3) strengthening customary land rights and reinforc­ing compensation policies, and (4) mean­ingfully involving locals in land deal negotiations. This contribution responds to the deficit in research on land deals’ impacts on livelihoods and well-being and lays the groundwork for future research.

Why is sub‐Saharan Africa an attractive destination to foreign land grabbers? Evidence from country characteristics

“…Despite these pernicious effects of LASLA (Nkansah‐Dwamena, 2021b), many LASLA advocates claim that it can positively contribute to achieving the host country's development goals if structured carefully (Nkansah‐Dwamena, 2021a). These include employment creation, global economic integration, technology transfer, rural development, and agriculture modernization (Chukwuma, 2020; Hufe & Heuermann, 2017; Shete & Rutten, 2015).…”

Navigating urbanization implications: effects of land expropriation on farmers’ livelihoods in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

“…Furthermore, the sustainable livelihood theory holds significance in shaping this study, asserting that the livelihood of inhabitants should be considered across various dimensions. Compensation for expropriation, according to this theory, should encompass diverse losses experienced by landholders, including economic, social, environmental, and psychological aspects (Kabra, 2016;Li et al, 2018;Nkansah-Dwamena, 2021).…”

Global Perspectives: Exploring Disruptive Technology Challenges for Consumers in Sub-Saharan Africa

“…Taking a market-based approach to poverty reduction requires the assistance of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), governments, and local markets. In the absence of legitimate political leadership in Sub-Saharan Africa, the only hope for locals to move out of extreme poverty is utilizing NGO programs (Burchardt & Swidler, 2020;Hickey, Lavers, Niño-Zarazúa, & Seekings, 2018;Nkansah-Dwamena, 2021;Rakodi, 2016). The International Finance Corporation (IFC), which is part of the World Bank Group, continuously works with the private sector and supports Sub-Saharan Africa; for example, $4.7 billion was spent in 2017 to help in the infrastructure, education, renewable energy, and healthcare in 30 countries (Fan et al, 2021;International Finance Corporation (IFC), 2019;Sy & Gutman, 2015).…”