2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2004.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can learners use concordance feedback for writing errors?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
132
0
9

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 260 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
6
132
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings revealed that these learners were able to induce valid patterns from self-selected concordances and to use these patterns in self-correcting errors. But another research done by Gaskell & Cobb (2004) concentrates on grammatical errors. This study investigated the role of using concordance feedback in correcting L2 learners' sentence-level writing errors.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings revealed that these learners were able to induce valid patterns from self-selected concordances and to use these patterns in self-correcting errors. But another research done by Gaskell & Cobb (2004) concentrates on grammatical errors. This study investigated the role of using concordance feedback in correcting L2 learners' sentence-level writing errors.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE TEACHING AND RESEARCH corrections according to concordance evidence (Gaskell & Cobb, 2004;Gilmore, 2009). By comparing the online dictionary and corpora, we found that corpora are more useful in assisting learners make more accurate corrections in the long run.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The task focuses on teaching/practising vocabulary due to the importance and complexity of teaching and learning vocabulary but also because in corpus-derived material it is easier for learners to notice and study lexical information (Gaskell & Cobb, 2004) and concordance work caters particularly well for the depth of vocabulary acquisition (Cobb, 1999). The language items addressed in the task are the following three usages of the verb take: (i) in the sense of to last, (ii) as part of the phrase take to (the streets) in the sense of to make for/flee to, and (iii) as part of the phrase take place.…”
Section: Sanja Marinovmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result shows that learners' attitude and computer literacy influence the effect of DDL. Gaskell and Cobb (2004) conducted a research on 20 low-intermediate English learners in Canada, and investigated their ability to make revision with the help the concordancer. The result showed that concordancer reference may not be the "miracle cure for sentence errors" (Gaskell & Cobb, 2004, p. 315).…”
Section: Writing Process Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%