2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.intermet.2010.01.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can local hot spots induce α2/γ lamellae during incomplete massive transformation of γ-TiAl alloys?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, different cooling rates lead to different phase constitutions of the prealloyed powders with different sizes, and α phase transforms into γ m phase (massive γ phase) in coarse powders due to a relatively low cooling rate [35]. During the subsequent densification process, the specific strain of γ m phase is generated due to lattice distortion, which provides a driving force for subsequent grain growth and full lamination [36]. On the other hand, segregation during solidification leads to the reduction in or disappearance of the α phase in local regions, resulting in γ-phase coarsening without the pinning effect of the α phase during subsequent densification [37].…”
Section: Microstructural Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, different cooling rates lead to different phase constitutions of the prealloyed powders with different sizes, and α phase transforms into γ m phase (massive γ phase) in coarse powders due to a relatively low cooling rate [35]. During the subsequent densification process, the specific strain of γ m phase is generated due to lattice distortion, which provides a driving force for subsequent grain growth and full lamination [36]. On the other hand, segregation during solidification leads to the reduction in or disappearance of the α phase in local regions, resulting in γ-phase coarsening without the pinning effect of the α phase during subsequent densification [37].…”
Section: Microstructural Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent experiments, e.g., as those by Hu et al [8], and according computational studies as the molecular dynamics simulations by Wu et al [9] and numerical studies by Steinmann and cooperators [10] have brought out that a so-called Kapitza interface is a satisfying physical representation, enforcing that the jump of the temperature at the interface must be proportional to the continuous heat flux across the interface. The second problem concerns the time evolution of the temperature profile in the particle and in the surrounding, e.g., with the aspect of the so-called autocatalytic effects (i.e., generation of second phases due to the local heating or cooling, see, e.g., [11]). This paper is devoted to the second problem, providing new mathematical tools to find analytical expressions for the temperature profiles.…”
Section: The Hot Spot and Precipitation Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the addition of B suppresses the formation of the massive γ phase and increases the tendency of lamellar structure formation by the refinement of the high-temperature α phase, whereas the cooling rated needed for the onset of massive γ formation is hardly changed [18]. The massive γ phase is commonly reported to nucleate at the grain boundaries during cooling [9,19,20], which means that a fine-grained initial microstructure can facilitate the massive γ formation. Actually, the volume fraction of the massive γ phase depends on the specialized window of cooling rates for each alloy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%