Can local landscape attributes explain species richness patterns at macroecological scales?

Abstract

Aim Although the influence on species richness of landscape attributes representing landscape composition and spatial configuration has been well documented at landscape scales, its effects remain little understood at macroecological scales. We aim to assess the role of landscape attributes, and their relative importance compared with climate, habitat heterogeneity and human influence (CHH) in particular, in shaping broad-scale richness patterns. Location Mainland China.Methods Species richness data for mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians were derived from the China Species Information Service. Together with the richness data, CHH variables and class-and landscape-level landscape metrics were calculated using grain sizes of 50 km × 50 km, 100 km × 100 km and 200 km × 200 km. At these multiple scales, the species richness of each taxonomic group was correlated with CHH and landscape variables using both ordinary least square (OLS) and simultaneous autoregressive (SAR) models; variation partitioning was used to assess the relative strength of landscape attributes versus CHH variables. ResultsIn general, climate is the most influential factor shaping richness patterns. Landscape attributes, especially class-level attributes, can also explain considerable variation in richness. Variation partitioning showed largely overlapped fractions of explained variation between landscape attributes and CHH variables. The pure explanatory power of landscape attributes was small for mammals, reptiles and amphibians, showing R 2 of 1-3%, while it was considerably larger for birds, showing R 2 of 5-10%. The environment-richness correlations showed scale dependency, but the pure explanatory power of landscape attributes appeared to show small changes across the scale range used in this study.Main conclusions In addition to CHH variables, landscape attributes can explain some broad-scale richness patterns, especially for birds. The incorporation of landscape attributes will be conducive to better understanding the drivers of richness patterns and modelling species richness at macroecological scales.

The resolution‐dependent role of landscape attributes in shaping macro‐scale biodiversity patterns

“…Our results demonstrate conspicuous relationships between landscape attributes and macroscopic patterns of mammal species richness in sub‐Saharan Africa and continental China, supporting the previous hypothesis that the strength of local landscape attributes can scale up to biogeographical levels, substantially shaping macroscopic biodiversity patterns (Martins et al, ; Ramesh et al, ; Xu et al, ). Importantly, we show that their strength depends to a considerable extent on both spatial and thematic resolutions of land cover data.…”

“…This possibility can be derived from the distinction that weak effects of landscape attributes were often found in the studies based on coarse‐resolution data (e.g., 10 km in the studies by Thuiller et al, ; Triviño, Thuiller, Cabeza, Hickler, & Araújo, ), whereas strong effects were mostly reported in more recent work using newer landscape datasets with finer resolutions (e.g., c . 0.5 km by Reino et al, ; 1 km by Xu et al, ). In this sense, testing whether the resolution of land cover data is indeed responsible for these contrasting findings can help to clarify the role of landscape attributes in shaping macroecological patterns.…”

Plant geographical range size and climate stability in China: Growth form matters

“…The unique contribution of each variable was calculated by subtracting the pseudo-R 2 of the SAR model excluding that variable from the pseudo-R 2 of the full SAR model (Morueta-Holme et al, 2013;Xu et al, 2014). We excluded the spatial signal of SAR prediction because our focus was the effects of explanatory variables rather than their joint effects with space.…”

Geographical patterns and environmental drivers of functional diversity and trait space of amphibians of Europe

“…Amphibians, although ectotherm vertebrates and sensitive to temperature as well, also usually require water for reproduction, and measures of energy usually best describe their richness gradients (Rodríguez et al, ). As such, studies on the broad‐scale ecology of amphibians show that landscape heterogeneity and anthropogenic attributes play a secondary role than climate and energy availability on shaping amphibian distribution (e.g., Xu et al, but see Tsianou & Kallimanis, ). Past climate variations and historical conditions have been reported that also shape distribution patterns of amphibians (Olalla‐Tárraga et al, ).…”