Can low-input agriculture in semi-arid Burkina Faso feed its soil, livestock and people?

Assogba, Gildas G.C.; Berre, David; Adam, Myriam; Descheemaeker, Katrien

doi:10.1016/j.eja.2023.126983

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 65 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Yet several studies suggest that farm-level recovery rates remain low overall (Dongmo et al, 2012b: < 10% of potential recovered in northern Cameroon; Blanchard et al, 2013: ~40% of available CCP and LCP recovered in southern Mali), though without providing detailed information on the conditions and quantities recycled of CCP and LCP. This private management of co-product flows at the farm scale coexists with collective management of co-product flows at the village scale (Assogba et al, 2023). Considering the increasing land pressure, agropastoral farmers are in a more and more challenging situation to benefit from the co-products generated by their crops and their herds.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Recycling crop and livestock co-products on agro-pastoral farms for the agroecological transition: more than 60% potentially recoverable in western Burkina Faso

Zoungrana,

Ouedraogo,

Sib

et al. 2023

Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Description of the subject. Considering the increasing price of animal feeds and synthetic fertilizers, agro-pastoral farmers of Western Africa, in Burkina Faso in particular, try to increase the use of Crops Co-Products (CCP: straw, tops, stalks) and Livestocks Co-Products (LCP: faeces) to feed animals and fertilize cultivated fields, however face challenges to do so. Objectives. Our objectives were to characterize the management and recycling practices of CCP and LCP at the farm level and to assess their contribution to the coverage of forage and manure needs. Method. Data collected by survey on 60 agro-pastoral farms in six villages in western Burkina Faso. On-farm management practices of CCP and LCP characterized by eight variables. Flows of CCP and LCP characterized at three levels: farm, crop and livestock units, and type of co-product management system. Results. Out of the ~21 tons of CCP available per farm, 23% are recycled as forage, and 77% are not or scarcely recovered by farms. Out of the ~24 tons of LCP available per farm, 40% are recovered for use as manure, 60% are scattered off-farm during grazing and mobility. Co-products recycling covers only 16% of farm needs in forage and manure. Conclusions. Co-products are poorly recycled, and their level of recovery depends on farm equipment, manpower and herd mobility. Facing this challenge, we are developing a farm-level co-products recycling/advisory tool to support farmers in the agroecological transition.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%