2017
DOI: 10.21037/gs.2017.03.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can magnetic resonance imaging obviate the need for biopsy for microcalcifications?

Abstract: Background: Although microcalcifications detected with mammography (MG) are usually biopsied, biopsies cannot be performed in all cases. We sought to determine if magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings could indicate whether stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy (SVAB) is necessary. Methods:Patients with mammographically detected Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 3, 4, and 5 microcalcifications were analyzed from April 2012 to September 2014. All patients underwent MRI. All patients with enha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the addition of DCE-MRI after mammography could decrease 65.5% (129/197) of the biopsy, and the PPV increased from 25.4% to 69.1%, with 3 false negatives of non-high-grade DCIS. Although the diagnostic value of DCE-MRI in mammographic microcalcifications has been investigated in several reports, to the best of our knowledge, no study has specifically analyzed that in the case of suspicious amorphous calcifications ( 1 3 , 5 7 , 17 26 ). We included the largest dataset (n = 197) of suspicious amorphous calcifications to date.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, the addition of DCE-MRI after mammography could decrease 65.5% (129/197) of the biopsy, and the PPV increased from 25.4% to 69.1%, with 3 false negatives of non-high-grade DCIS. Although the diagnostic value of DCE-MRI in mammographic microcalcifications has been investigated in several reports, to the best of our knowledge, no study has specifically analyzed that in the case of suspicious amorphous calcifications ( 1 3 , 5 7 , 17 26 ). We included the largest dataset (n = 197) of suspicious amorphous calcifications to date.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) is a highly sensitive imaging modality for breast cancer detection, with reported sensitivity up to 100% in patients with suspicious lesions ( 1 3 ).However, the diagnostic value of DCE-MRI for suspicious microcalcifications detected by mammography is a topic of debate ( 4 9 ),and the current guideline does not recommend downgrading suspicious calcifications based on benign MRI appearance. Recent meta-analyses suggest that the absence of enhancement on DCE-MRI can be used to rule out malignancy for some BI-RADS 4 microcalcifications and avoid unnecessary biopsy ( 10 , 11 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%