Can Market Potential Explain Regional Disparities in Developing Countries? Evidence from Turkey

Abstract

Regional disparity is one of the important characteristics of the Turkish economy. This study examines the impact of market potential on the regional differences in Turkey by investigating wages in the manufacturing industry for 1987 and 2000. Evidence suggests that market potential is an important determinant of inequality in Turkey. In addition, public–private decomposition reshapes the dispersion of wages supportive of rising heterogeneity in the private manufacturing industry. This increases the explanatory power of market potential, which is observed to be high in western Turkey and diminishes toward eastern Turkey. Our findings highlight that during the postliberalization era of the 1980s, Turkey's regional inequality concern transformed into a structural problem which can be explained by provincial market potential. Moreover, our results underline that the modern geography framework, which has been tested for developed economies, is able to elucidate the regional differences in a developing country suffering from persistent imbalances.

Winners and losers of rapid growth in Turkey: Analysis of the spatial variability of convergence

“…We do not apply these variants due to two specific reasons. First, as discussed by Karahasan, Doğruel, and Doğruel () road quality is highly variable across geography in Turkey (i.e., eastern geography is highly mountainous). Second, even within coastal and relatively less mountainous regions quality between highways and non‐highway roads are divergent.…”

Spatial varying relationship between financial development and new firm formation: Evidence from a developing country

“…Even regional income gaps is highly studied, other dimensions of regional disparities are also starting to receive rising interest among development economists. Filiztekin (2009), Fatih Çelebioğlu and Sandy Dall'erba (2010), Adem Yavuz Elveren (2010), Hasan E. Duran (2013), Filiz Yeşilyurt and J. Paul Elhorst (2014), Ayşe Özden Birkan and Serpil Kahraman Akdoğdu (2016), Burhan Can Karahasan, Doğruel, and Doğruel (2016), all find that other socio-economic characteristics of regions are also suffering from inequalities.…”

Government Quality and Regional Development in Turkey

“…On contrary it is relatively less explanatory to focus on spillovers originating from greater distances as spatial spillovers seem to weaken as we try to connect each province by using distance as a discount factor. Karahasan (2015), Karahasan, Doğruel and Doğruel (2016) factors shaping the evolution of economic activity is also regionally dispersed unequally, leaving eastern regions less developed compared to the ones among the western territory. However our findings on the decomposition analyses indicate that there are sizable similarities between some eastern and western regions that historically share different economic fundamentals and development levels.…”