2021
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/kg64j
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Musical Ability be Tested Online?

Abstract: We sought to determine whether an objective test of musical ability could be administered online successfully. A sample of 754 participants was tested with an online version of the Musical Ear Test (MET), which had Melody and Rhythm subtests. Both subtests had 52 trials, each of which required participants to determine whether standard and comparison auditory sequences were identical. The testing session also included the Goldsmiths Musical Sophistication Index (Gold-MSI), a test of general cognitive ability, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For demographics, L2 ability had small associations with gender, education, and cognitive ability. Similar but illusory male superiority effects are evident for self-estimates of IQ (Furnham et al, 2005), academic ability (Cooper et al, 2018), job performance (Herbst, 2020), and musical ability (Correia et al, 2023), even though actual ability does not differ between men and women. For education and general ability, positive associations with L2 ability provided evidence for the construct validity of our measure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…For demographics, L2 ability had small associations with gender, education, and cognitive ability. Similar but illusory male superiority effects are evident for self-estimates of IQ (Furnham et al, 2005), academic ability (Cooper et al, 2018), job performance (Herbst, 2020), and musical ability (Correia et al, 2023), even though actual ability does not differ between men and women. For education and general ability, positive associations with L2 ability provided evidence for the construct validity of our measure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%