2023
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/acad82
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Neutron Star Mergers Alone Explain the r-process Enrichment of the Milky Way?

Abstract: Comparing Galactic chemical evolution models to the observed elemental abundances in the Milky Way, we show that neutron star mergers can be a leading r-process site only if at low metallicities such mergers have very short delay times and significant ejecta masses that are facilitated by the masses of the compact objects. Namely, black hole–neutron star mergers, depending on the black hole spins, can play an important role in the early chemical enrichment of the Milky Way. We also show that none of the binary… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The multimessenger detection of the neutron star merger (NSM) GW170817 (Abbott et al 2017) confirmed (Drout et al 2017;Kasen et al 2017;Kasliwal et al 2017;Tanaka et al 2017;Watson et al 2019) the long-standing theory that the decompression of NS material following its disruption during a merger could trigger an r-process (Lattimer & Schramm 1974, 1976Symbalisty & Schramm 1982;Meyer 1989;Davies et al 1994;Freiburghaus et al 1999). However, questions remain as to whether NSMs can explain the full pattern of r-process enrichment observed across time and space (e.g., Côté et al 2019;Zevin et al 2019;van de Voort et al 2020;Jeon et al 2021;Molero et al 2021;de los Reyes et al 2022;Naidu et al 2022;Cavallo et al 2023;Kobayashi et al 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The multimessenger detection of the neutron star merger (NSM) GW170817 (Abbott et al 2017) confirmed (Drout et al 2017;Kasen et al 2017;Kasliwal et al 2017;Tanaka et al 2017;Watson et al 2019) the long-standing theory that the decompression of NS material following its disruption during a merger could trigger an r-process (Lattimer & Schramm 1974, 1976Symbalisty & Schramm 1982;Meyer 1989;Davies et al 1994;Freiburghaus et al 1999). However, questions remain as to whether NSMs can explain the full pattern of r-process enrichment observed across time and space (e.g., Côté et al 2019;Zevin et al 2019;van de Voort et al 2020;Jeon et al 2021;Molero et al 2021;de los Reyes et al 2022;Naidu et al 2022;Cavallo et al 2023;Kobayashi et al 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Since the gravitational wave detection from the neutron star merger GW170817 (Abbott et al 2017) and subsequent spectroscopic observations (Watson et al 2019), neutron star mergers are probably the main producers of rprocess elements, as predicted by modern simulations (Thielemann et al 2017). Recently, Ekanger et al 2023 confirmed that black hole-neutron star mergers also produce a significant amount of r-process elements through nucleosynthesis yields from numerical simulations, as indicated by previous studies as well (e.g., Lattimer & Schramm 1976;Freiburghaus et al 1999;Nishimura et al 2016;Kobayashi et al 2023). The r-process also happens at other astrophysical sites, such as core-collapse supernovae (e.g., Wheeler et al 1998;Ekanger et al 2023) and magnetorotational supernovae (e.g., Winteler et al 2012;Reichert et al 2021Reichert et al , 2023.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Some studies suggest that these merger rates depend on redshift and metallicity such that in low metallicity environments, the BHNS merger rate is actually higher than the BNS merger rate. This would alter the evolution history of enrichment of stars with heavy nuclei, and also in principle change the distribution of BH masses and spins (see Kobayashi et al 2023, and sources therein). To check the robustness of the local rate assumption, we look at the redshift evolution of BHNS mergers within a redshift of ∼ 0.05 (corresponding to the proposed LIGO O4 BNS sensitivity range and LSST's magnitude limited distance of ∼ 200 Mpc) for the three models in Zhu et al (2021b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In parallel, another method used to understand this question involves considering the abundance evolution over time for all elements, known as galactic chemical evolution (GCE; see, e.g., Côté et al 2017Côté et al , 2018Kobayashi et al 2020). GCE studies combine galaxy evolution, population syntheses of transients like mergers and supernovae, and nucleosynthesis models to explain the sources of the periodic table (Côté et al 2019;Kobayashi et al 2023). Considering a holistic view of the sources of all the elements, that can fold in nucleosynthesis results, is an important, and independent, theoretical approach for understanding the sources of the r-process elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%