2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00114-022-01808-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can nuclear aquatic environmental DNA be a genetic marker for the accurate estimation of species abundance?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While most eDNA studies have employed short mtDNA markers, recent studies have proposed the use of nuclear DNA markers for investigating inter‐ and intraspecific variations (Andres et al, 2021; Dugal, Thomas, Wilkinson, et al, 2022; Jo et al, 2022; Minamoto et al, 2017). Since nuclear DNA is more informative than mtDNA, the development of nuclear DNA marker‐based approaches would enhance the utility of eDNA for analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While most eDNA studies have employed short mtDNA markers, recent studies have proposed the use of nuclear DNA markers for investigating inter‐ and intraspecific variations (Andres et al, 2021; Dugal, Thomas, Wilkinson, et al, 2022; Jo et al, 2022; Minamoto et al, 2017). Since nuclear DNA is more informative than mtDNA, the development of nuclear DNA marker‐based approaches would enhance the utility of eDNA for analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several factors influence this estimation, highlighting the challenges in accurately assessing abundance using eDNA. Biotic factors, such as the physiological and behavioral characteristics of organisms, can affect the release and degradation rates of DNA, leading to variations in eDNA concentration (Jo et al., 2022). Additionally, abiotic factors, including water temperature, flow rates, sedimentation, and UV radiation, can influence the transport, degradation, and detection of eDNA (Hansen et al., 2018; Lacoursière‐Roussel et al., 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another factor that influences the degradation of eDNA is pH. eDNA tends to have higher degradation rates in acidic conditions compared to more alkaline environments because of the hydrolytic processes [101,107,109,111]. Bacterial activities have also been found to contribute to eDNA degradation.…”
Section: Applications Of Environmental Dna (Edna) For Ias Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%