2002
DOI: 10.1672/0277-5212(2002)022[0509:cnasas]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can nutrients alone shift a sedge meadow towards dominance by the invasive Typha × glauca

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
118
1
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
118
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, nitrogen-rich leaf material often attracts herbivores (Mattson 1980), which could reduce litter inputs or reduce plant vigor. However, the greatest threat nutrient loading poses to sedge-meadow restoration is promotion of competitively dominant invasive species, such as P. arundinacea and T. x glauca, which readily allocate nutrients to growing tissues and reduce C. stricta biomass when grown in mixtures under eutrophic conditions (Wetzel and Van Der Valk 1998, Green and Galatowitsch 2002, Woo and Zedler 2002. In fact, Kercher et al (2007) noted synergistic interactions between prolonged flooding and nutrient addition that promote an invaded state, which might be maintained through feedbacks (Zedler 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, nitrogen-rich leaf material often attracts herbivores (Mattson 1980), which could reduce litter inputs or reduce plant vigor. However, the greatest threat nutrient loading poses to sedge-meadow restoration is promotion of competitively dominant invasive species, such as P. arundinacea and T. x glauca, which readily allocate nutrients to growing tissues and reduce C. stricta biomass when grown in mixtures under eutrophic conditions (Wetzel and Van Der Valk 1998, Green and Galatowitsch 2002, Woo and Zedler 2002. In fact, Kercher et al (2007) noted synergistic interactions between prolonged flooding and nutrient addition that promote an invaded state, which might be maintained through feedbacks (Zedler 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paradoxically, another common invasive, Lythrum salicaria (LYSA2), did not respond independently to CSI or HMI despite its dominance of the seed bank (Johnson 2003, Frieswyk and and reports that it increased with disturbance in Great Lakes coastal wetlands Wolf 2005, Stanley et al 2005). We also expected that the cover of Carex species would decrease in response to land use intensification (Galatowitsch et al 2000), grazing (Middleton 2002), sedimentation (Werner and Zedler 2002), nutrient inputs (Woo and Zedler 2002), and invasion by TYinv and PHAR3 (Wilcox et al 1985). Four of the five Carex species that were incorporated into the final models did decrease with increasing CSI, but C. lacustris (CALA16) unexpectedly increased with increas-PLATE 1.…”
Section: Taxa Incorporated Into Basin-wide Csi Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The invasive TYGL has displaced native Typha throughout the Great Lakes (Chow-Fraser et al 1998, Frieswyk and. TYGL has high growth and photosynthetic rates (Farnsworth and Meyerson 2003) and short rhizome lengths (Woo and Zedler 2002) that allow it to form dense, monotypic stands. TYGL is highly competitive under fluctuating water levels (Smith 1987, Waters and Shay 1992, Galatowitsch et al 1999), in part due to its floating mat formation (Hogg and Wein 1988), but its expansion has been linked to water-level stabilization in several studies (Shay et al 1999, Boers et al 2007, Wilcox et al 2007).…”
Section: Taxa Incorporated Into Basin-wide Csi Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e. Select marsh design appropriate for target vegetation The design of marsh compensation sites can influence the establishment and composition of plant communities. 42,43 Most compensation marshes in the estuary are built as elevated marsh benches with a protective riprap berm bordering the foreshore ( Figure 7A). Although design specifics vary, these marshes are typically capable of supporting target sedge communities.…”
Section: Consider Influence Of Salt Wedge In Selection Of Native Smentioning
confidence: 99%