2015
DOI: 10.1257/aer.p20151024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Online Learning Bend the Higher Education Cost Curve?

Abstract: The earnings premium associated with additional education in the United States has risen markedly since 1980, suggesting that the supply of educated labor has not kept pace with demand (e.g., Goldin and Katz 2008). Yet the status of U.S. higher education funding is a key impediment to growing the supply of skills. Inflation-adjusted state appropriations for higher Online learning technologies are regarded by most observers as the best hope for cost-saving innovations in higher education, with the primary chann… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
56
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
56
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we are not able to provide a precise estimate of the start-up expenditures in developing the blended course, we do have information regarding the student-teacher ratio before and after the policy change in all the targeted English courses. One reason for the support behind the expansion of online learning is that it has the potential to help address funding insufficiencies in higher education by increasing student to teacher ratio and reducing the average cost per (5) student for instruction (Cukier, 1997;Deming, Goldin, Katz, & Yuchtman, 2015). Since online learning does not have physical space limitations on enrollment, colleges can increase class sizes in online or blended courses as a response to changes in demand relatively easily compared to brick-and-mortar classrooms.…”
Section: Basic Empirical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we are not able to provide a precise estimate of the start-up expenditures in developing the blended course, we do have information regarding the student-teacher ratio before and after the policy change in all the targeted English courses. One reason for the support behind the expansion of online learning is that it has the potential to help address funding insufficiencies in higher education by increasing student to teacher ratio and reducing the average cost per (5) student for instruction (Cukier, 1997;Deming, Goldin, Katz, & Yuchtman, 2015). Since online learning does not have physical space limitations on enrollment, colleges can increase class sizes in online or blended courses as a response to changes in demand relatively easily compared to brick-and-mortar classrooms.…”
Section: Basic Empirical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total HOU expense per student is €1024.84. 10 From this amount we have to subtract the amount related to tuition fees i.e., €912.41 (see above subsection Private cost results in HOU) that is a part of the university's budget but it is calculated here under the "private cost" of studies. Therefore, the total univer- 8 This Special Account for Research Funds is called ELKE in Greek.…”
Section: University Cost and Social Cost Results In Uom Uoc And Houmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Department of Education, 2013). Non-selective two-and four-year institutions enroll 8.5 percent of their students fully online, compared to only 1.5 percent in highly selective institutions (Deming, Goldin, Katz, & Yuchtman, 2015). This may be important to consider as students who attend community colleges and work towards associate degrees are more likely to come from traditionally underrepresented groups with more disadvantaged backgrounds (Mooney & Foley, 2011;U.S.…”
Section: Potential Mediating Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%