2020
DOI: 10.1007/jhep11(2020)129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can $$ \overline{\mathrm{MS}} $$ parton distributions be negative?

Abstract: It is common lore that Parton Distribution Functions (PDFs) in the $$ \overline{\mathrm{MS}} $$ MS ¯ factorization scheme can become negative beyond leading order due to the collinear subtraction which is needed in order to define partonic cross sections. We show that this is in fact not the case and next-to-leading order (NLO) $$ \overline{\mathrm{MS}} $$ MS ¯ PDFs are actually positive in the perturbative regime. In order to prove this, we modify the subtraction prescription, and perform the collinear … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What we wish to argue here is that, since this subtraction is the only possible source of negative numbers at z = 1, if A a (z) happens to be negative in a given scheme where PDFs are supposedly positive (see [55] for MS), this signals that the AP CT have likely over-subtracted some collinear contributions from the real-emission contributions, and this can yield the observed negative hadronic cross sections. This is indeed what happens for quarkonia since the NLO threshold contributions (ŝ = M 2 ) are found to be positive-definite for η Q and several other states at least for μ F = μ R .…”
Section: The Nlo Partonic Cross Section and Its He Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…What we wish to argue here is that, since this subtraction is the only possible source of negative numbers at z = 1, if A a (z) happens to be negative in a given scheme where PDFs are supposedly positive (see [55] for MS), this signals that the AP CT have likely over-subtracted some collinear contributions from the real-emission contributions, and this can yield the observed negative hadronic cross sections. This is indeed what happens for quarkonia since the NLO threshold contributions (ŝ = M 2 ) are found to be positive-definite for η Q and several other states at least for μ F = μ R .…”
Section: The Nlo Partonic Cross Section and Its He Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Understanding the possible connection with a recent study of the positivity of the PDFs in the MS scheme[55] and the collinear factorisation scheme[56] is left for a future study 13. Our choice has mainly been driven by technical reasons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The n3fit library allows for a flexible specification of the neural network model adopted to parametrise the PDFs, whose settings can be selected automatically via the built-in hyperoptimisation tooling [30]. These include the neural network type and architecture, the activation functions, and the initialisation strategy; the choice of optimiser and of its corresponding parameters; and hyperparameters related to the implementation in the fit of theoretical constraints such as PDF positivity [31] and integrability. The settings for a PDF fit are input via a declarative run card.…”
Section: The N3fit Fitting Codementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At given y one can hence always achieve a negative 8 J by taking the scales μ 1 and μ 2 sufficiently high.…”
Section: Collins-soper Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether positivity bounds on parton distributions actually hold turns out to be a non-trivial question. At leading order (LO) accuracy, the positivity of PDFs can quite directly be deduced from the positivity of cross sections, whilst the situation is more involved at next-to-leading order (NLO) in the strong coupling [7,8]. When derived along such lines, positivity holds for renormalisation scales μ that are high enough for the approximations of leading-twist dominance and of the perturbative expansion to be valid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%