Can Particulate Air Sampling Predict Microbial Load in Operating Theatres for Arthroplasty?

Abstract

Several studies have proposed that the microbiological quality of the air in operating theatres be indirectly evaluated by means of particle counting, a technique derived from industrial clean-room technology standards, using airborne particle concentration as an index of microbial contamination. However, the relationship between particle counting and microbiological sampling has rarely been evaluated and demonstrated in operating theatres. The aim of the present study was to determine whether particle counting could predict microbiological contamination of the air in an operating theatre during 95 surgical arthroplasty procedures. This investigation was carried out over a period of three months in 2010 in an orthopedic operating theatre devoted exclusively to prosthetic surgery. During each procedure, the bacterial contamination of the air was determined by means of active sampling; at the same time, airborne particulate contamination was assessed throughout the entire procedure. On considering the total number of surgical operations, the mean value of the total bacterial load in the center of the operating theatre proved to be 35 CFU/m3; the mean particle count was 4,194,569 no./m3 for particles of diameter ≥0.5 µm and 13,519 no./m3 for particles of diameter ≥5 µm. No significant differences emerged between the median values of the airborne microbial load recorded during the two types of procedure monitored. Particulates with a diameter of ≥0.5 µm were detected in statistically higher concentrations (p<0.001) during knee-replacement procedures. By contrast, particulates with a diameter of ≥5 µm displayed a statistically higher concentration during hip-replacement procedures (p<0.05). The results did not reveal any statistically significant correlation between microbial loads and particle counts for either of the particle diameters considered (≥0.5 µm and ≥5 µm). Consequently, microbiological monitoring remains the most suitable method of evaluating the quality of air in operating theatres.

Assessment of Airborne Particles in Indoor Environments: Applicability of Particle Counting for Prediction of Bioaerosol Concentrations

“…Simple counting of particles of a certain size class might enable an approximation of indoor air microbial levels. However, inconsistent results have been published, with significant correlation in some cases and no relationship in others (Hargreaves et al, 2003;Agranovski et al, 2004;Haas et al, 2007;Cristina et al, 2012).…”

Aerosol-Transmitted Infections—a New Consideration for Public Health and Infection Control Teams

“…Particle size counters have been suggested as being more useful in giving immediate results than microbiological sampling [56]. However, correlation between particulate counts and numbers of airborne bacteria is poor or lacking [58].…”

A Systems Approach to Assess Transport and Diffusion of Hazardous Airborne Particles in a Large Surgical Suite: Potential Impacts on Viral Airborne Transmission

“…This methodology addresses only the physical side of the problem and therefore does not answer the effectiveness of airborne particles to induce COVID-19. Some of the difficulties encountered in such studies are that air sampling and infection may or may not be strongly correlated [14,15]. However, it is an important step to quantify the level of exposure in order to estimate the corresponding viral load in part.…”