2014
DOI: 10.1111/dom.12354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can people with type 2 diabetes live longer than those without? A comparison of mortality in people initiated with metformin or sulphonylurea monotherapy and matched, non‐diabetic controls

Abstract: Patients with type 2 diabetes initiated with metformin monotherapy had longer survival than did matched, non-diabetic controls. Those treated with sulphonylurea had markedly reduced survival compared with both matched controls and those receiving metformin monotherapy. This supports the position of metformin as first-line therapy and implies that metformin may confer benefit in non-diabetes. Sulphonylurea remains a concern.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
194
0
15

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 313 publications
(220 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
5
194
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…The participants were either euglycemic normal controls (i), diabetics treated with sulfonylurea (ii), or diabetics treated with metformin (iii) (Table 1B). The sulfonylurea group was added in the study because diabetic individuals treated with metformin have increased survival compared with nondiabetics and with diabetics on sulfonylurea (Bannister et al ., 2014). All groups were matched based on age, sex, race and body mass index (BMI) ( n  = 20 per group; Table 1B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participants were either euglycemic normal controls (i), diabetics treated with sulfonylurea (ii), or diabetics treated with metformin (iii) (Table 1B). The sulfonylurea group was added in the study because diabetic individuals treated with metformin have increased survival compared with nondiabetics and with diabetics on sulfonylurea (Bannister et al ., 2014). All groups were matched based on age, sex, race and body mass index (BMI) ( n  = 20 per group; Table 1B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In C57BL/6 mice, Met was toxic at a higher concentration of 10 000 ppm (1%) (Martin‐Montalvo et al ., 2013), and it is possible that evaluation of doses higher or lower than the 1000 ppm dose we used might have produced stronger evidence of benefit. Observational data suggest that patients with diabetes who take metformin have lower mortality risks than age‐matched non‐diabetic patients (Bannister et al ., 2014). These suggestive reports, together with the strong evidence that Met can be administered with few side effects over many years in people, have prompted suggestions that this agent should be used in large‐scale clinical trials to prevent age‐associated disease in non‐diabetic subjects (Hall, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data indicating that metformin can be used as a potential geroprotector show that it is effective in alleviating various age‐associated disorders, including cardiovascular disease, cancer, and cognitive decline, and decreasing the number of deaths of elderly diabetic patients (Bannister et al., 2014). In addition, the effects of metformin on elongating lifespan have been demonstrated in animal models, including worms (Cabreiro et al., 2013; De Haes et al., 2014; Onken & Driscoll, 2010; Wu et al., 2016), mice (Martin‐Montalvo et al., 2013), and rats (Smith et al., 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%