2009
DOI: 10.1038/eye.2009.241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can phaco be a cost-effective solution to cataract blindness? Costs and outcomes in Nepal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2 We agree with Dr Tan that a small increase in unit cost can add up to a large increase in total cost in a high-volume setting. However, this must be set against the improved visual outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…2 We agree with Dr Tan that a small increase in unit cost can add up to a large increase in total cost in a high-volume setting. However, this must be set against the improved visual outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Treatment includes drug withdrawal and control of bleeding. 2 We believe this is the first reported case of quinine-induced thrombocytopenia associated with intraocular haemorrhage.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Treatment includes drug withdrawal and control of bleeding. 2 We believe this is the first reported case of quinine-induced thrombocytopenia associated with intraocular haemorrhage.Awareness of quinine use in the elderly population is important. The Royal College of Ophthalmologists local anaesthetic guidelines suggest a pre-operative FBC only for patients with a history of systemic disease or abnormal examination.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…13 A separate study book for each participant was prepared including a photo, detailed address and separate pages for data on recruitment, surgery, discharge, and 6-week and 1-year follow-up. Computer data entry was done by two different persons, then validated by a third person for corrections.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 This study arose from the clinical observation that implanting an inexpensive rigid IOL after phacoemulsification appeared to give visual outcomes comparable to more expensive foldable IOLs. 13 We designed this randomised controlled trial in order to make a fair comparison between the two types of IOL following phacoemulsification. The rationale for the study is that, if an inexpensive rigid IOL is as safe and effective as a foldable IOL, phaco could be accessible to patients in LMICs who currently cannot afford a foldable IOL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%