2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.106665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can porous carbons be a remedy for PFAS pollution in water? A perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currenlty, featuring larger overall hydrophobic surface areas, novel strategies including powdered activated carbon (PAC), nanoporous carbon, enhanced biochars, and cellulose are developed pursuing higher efficiency and capacity than GAC. ,,, However, the efficiency of activated carbon base strategies is commonly compromised in the presence of other soluble co-contaminants . Sorption of those nonfluorinated impurities can result in the sorbent reaching capacity prior to the capture of PFAS.…”
Section: Interaction Mechanisms With Pfasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Currenlty, featuring larger overall hydrophobic surface areas, novel strategies including powdered activated carbon (PAC), nanoporous carbon, enhanced biochars, and cellulose are developed pursuing higher efficiency and capacity than GAC. ,,, However, the efficiency of activated carbon base strategies is commonly compromised in the presence of other soluble co-contaminants . Sorption of those nonfluorinated impurities can result in the sorbent reaching capacity prior to the capture of PFAS.…”
Section: Interaction Mechanisms With Pfasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27,28 The micropore surface area on GAC was found to be essential in the hydrophobic interaction with PFAS, and preference of pore sizes has also been found to be associated with PFAS chain lengths. 29,30 Mesopores (0.002−0.05 μm) are found to be favored over micropores (<0.002 μm) in the adsorption of long-chain PFAS such as PFOS and PFOA, whereas contradictory findings are associated with the adsorption of shortchain PFASs. 26,31 Currenlty, featuring larger overall hydrophobic surface areas, novel strategies including powdered activated carbon (PAC), nanoporous carbon, enhanced biochars, and cellulose are developed pursuing higher efficiency and capacity than GAC.…”
Section: ■ Interaction Mechanisms With Pfas Hydrophobic Interaction W...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GAC, for instance, is well-known for its slow adsorption kinetics and comparatively lower efficiency in removing short-chain PFAS and precursors in comparison to long-chain counterparts. 20,21 On the other hand, superfine PAC facilitates the rapid diffusion of short-chain PFAS molecules for swift adsorption, 22 filtration steps. This drawback hampers the practical application of PAC in real-world drinking water treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, it is unclear at this stage whether these materials are able to retain PFAS precursors that have attracted increasing concerns in recent years in aqueous solutions. Furthermore, the process of producing carbon-based materials is highly energy intensive and has drawn scrutiny and attention recently in terms of greenhouse gas emissions . Compared to carbon-based materials, ion exchange resins have been reported to be less cost-effective and biosorbents exhibited lower adsorption capacity …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adsorbents for PFAS mainly include carbon-based materials, , ion exchange resins, , biosorbents, and clay-based materials. , Activated carbons (ACs), including granular and powdered AC (GAC and PAC), carbon nanotubes (CNTs), and biochar, are the main carbon-based materials for PFAS adsorption, of which powdered AC and CNTs showed high adsorption capacities. , The nonpolar functional groups of carbon-based adsorbents contribute to hydrophobic PFAS adsorption . Carbon-based materials, however, have encountered two critical issues that are well-recognized: namely, slow adsorption kinetics and much lower efficiency in removing short-chain PFAS than long-chain ones . Additionally, it is unclear at this stage whether these materials are able to retain PFAS precursors that have attracted increasing concerns in recent years in aqueous solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%