2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can professional development of teachers reduce disparity in student achievement?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
34
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This point is raised by other researchers too (Meissel et al, 2016;Polly et al, 2015). The study recommends that using need assessment tools such as the NSDC's (2001) Standards for Staff Development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This point is raised by other researchers too (Meissel et al, 2016;Polly et al, 2015). The study recommends that using need assessment tools such as the NSDC's (2001) Standards for Staff Development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teachers learn best through professional development that addresses their needs (Meissel et al, 2016). The theoretical framework of adult learning theory shares the need for ongoing quality professional development, which requires teachers to become lifelong adult learners (Eleonora, 2003;Hiebert, Gallimore, & Stigler, 2002).…”
Section: Needs For Professional Development Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to student motivation and self-efficacy, analysts also suggest that a variety of teacher factors, family and home environment elements are the predictors of student's reading achievement (Hemmerechts et al 2017;Meissel et al 2016;Muñoz et al 2013). The family and home environment factors, in particular, tend to have the largest influence on children's literacy development (Hampden-Thompson et al 2013).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An international trend in school education in countries as varied as England, New Zealand, the USA, Finland, Italy, Sweden and South Africa has been the implementation of programmes or practices focused on equalising learning outcomes between different student groups to promote equity and social justice (MacBeath & Mortimore, 2001;Murray & Malmgren, 2005;Grubb, 2007;Ainscow et al, 2010;Ndlovu, 2011;Faubert, 2012;Grimaldi, 2012;Ball, 2013;Payne, 2013;Persson, 2013;Meissel et al, 2016). At the same time, a body of scholarly literature critiques such programmes as lacking substance, appropriating equity discourses without without being too subversive, can, nevertheless, conscientise students.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%