Can propensity score matching be applied to cross-sectional data to evaluate Community-Based Rehabilitation? Results of a survey implementing the WHO’s Community-Based Rehabilitation indicators in Vietnam

Abstract

ObjectivesCommunity-Based Rehabilitation (CBR) is a multi-sectoral approach working to equalise opportunities and include people with disabilities in all aspects of life. The complexity of CBR and often limited resources lead to challenges when attempting to quantify its effectiveness, with randomisation and longitudinal data rarely possible. Statistical methods, such as propensity score matching (PSM), offer an alternative approach to evaluate a treatment when randomisation is not feasible. The aim of this study is to examine whether PSM can be an effective method to facilitate evaluations of results in CBR when data are cross-sectional.DesignCross-sectional survey.Setting and participantsData were collected using the WHO’s CBR Indicators in Vietnam, with treatment assignment (participating in CBR or not) determined by province of residence. 298 participants were selected through government records.ResultsPSM was conducted using one-to-one nearest neighbour method on 10 covariates. In the unmatched sample, significant differences between groups were found for six of the 10 covariates. PSM successfully adjusted for bias in all covariates in the matched sample (74 matched pairs). A paired t-test compared the outcome of ‘community inclusion’ (a score based on selected indicators) between CBR and non-CBR participants for both the matched and unmatched samples, with CBR participants found to have significantly worse community inclusion scores (mean=17.86, SD=6.30, 95% CI 16.45 to 19.32) than non-CBR participants (mean=20.93, SD=6.16, 95% CI 19.50 to 22.35); t(73)=3.068, p=0.001. This result did not differ between the matched and unmatched samples.ConclusionPSM successfully reduced bias between groups, though its application did not affect the tested outcome. PSM should be considered when analysing cross-sectional CBR data, especially for international comparisons where differences between populations may be greater.

Effect of disclosure of HIV status on patient representation and adherence to clinic visits in eastern Uganda: A propensity-score matched analysis

“…Our results are less likely to be biased by unmeasured confounders or the matching approach since sensitivity analysis showed robustness. Although our sample size reduced after the matching, the remaining sample size was relatively large to generate reliable conclusions since it met the minimum sample size for propensity-score matched analysis of 10(p+1), where p is the number of matching variables [ 41 , 42 ]. However, there are limitations.…”

Does completion of sputum smear monitoring have an effect on treatment success and cure rate among adult tuberculosis patients in rural Eastern Uganda? A propensity score-matched analysis

“…[34] Nevertheless, the remaining sample size met the commonly recommended minimum of 10(p+1), where p is the number of matching variables. [35,36] Lastly, the validity of sputum smear microscopy tests is a concern since this study could not validly conclude on the quality of sputum smear examinations with respect to false negative and false positive results. This concern is not unique to this study, but was highlighted in a previous study in India.…”

Association of rheumatoid arthritis with bronchial asthma and asthma-related comorbidities: A population-based national surveillance study

“…The cocor package was used to compare the correlation strength of the paired variables between patients with and without RA. To avoid bias, propensity score matching was performed between RA and non-RA groups with a 1:1 ratio based on age and sex using the MatchIt package (27,28). Subsequently, a network analysis was conducted on the matched population.…”