“…The appropriate solution is to employ an EC92 dummy variable scheme, to capture the impact of expectations about future market integration under the SMP. Aristotelous and Fountas (1996) found evidence of a significant inflow of FDI in anticipation of a barriers-free Europe, while Nicolaides and Thomsen (1991) argue that the SMP has affected only the timing of the Japanese FDI boom in the EC and not its overall long-run level.…”
Section: Internal Market Integration and Trade Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, Japanese firms preferred greenfield entry into the EC during the 1980s (Thomsen and Woolcock, 1993). By the late 1980s, on average, around 15 per cent of foreign affiliates in the EC were the result of acquisition (Nicolaides and Thomsen, 1991). However, the pattern differed between industries.…”
Section: The Form Of Fdi: Entry By Acquisition Versus the Establishmementioning
This article reviews the link between European integration and foreign direct investment (FDI) into the European Community (EC). A model is constructed using comparable US and Japanese data on new FDI flows for 1984-89. The data are clustered and pooled to enable intra-EC differences in the model to be investigated. It is found that new FDI has been linked to conventional host characteristics variables, whose effects vary considerably between groups of member countries. Differences between the equations for the USA and Japan are attributed to the contrasting degrees of establishment of US and Japanese affiliates. For Japanese firms, as comparative outsiders (compared with US firms), the impact of the announcement of the single market programme (SMP) has been marked.
“…The appropriate solution is to employ an EC92 dummy variable scheme, to capture the impact of expectations about future market integration under the SMP. Aristotelous and Fountas (1996) found evidence of a significant inflow of FDI in anticipation of a barriers-free Europe, while Nicolaides and Thomsen (1991) argue that the SMP has affected only the timing of the Japanese FDI boom in the EC and not its overall long-run level.…”
Section: Internal Market Integration and Trade Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, Japanese firms preferred greenfield entry into the EC during the 1980s (Thomsen and Woolcock, 1993). By the late 1980s, on average, around 15 per cent of foreign affiliates in the EC were the result of acquisition (Nicolaides and Thomsen, 1991). However, the pattern differed between industries.…”
Section: The Form Of Fdi: Entry By Acquisition Versus the Establishmementioning
This article reviews the link between European integration and foreign direct investment (FDI) into the European Community (EC). A model is constructed using comparable US and Japanese data on new FDI flows for 1984-89. The data are clustered and pooled to enable intra-EC differences in the model to be investigated. It is found that new FDI has been linked to conventional host characteristics variables, whose effects vary considerably between groups of member countries. Differences between the equations for the USA and Japan are attributed to the contrasting degrees of establishment of US and Japanese affiliates. For Japanese firms, as comparative outsiders (compared with US firms), the impact of the announcement of the single market programme (SMP) has been marked.
“…Thomsen (1993) argued against the `Fortress Europe' hypothesis and certain kinds of location-specific advantages, such as government inducements, and put forward a strong case for the appropriateness of PLC. It is suggested that this model provides a compelling rationale for the pattern of Japanese manufacturing investment in the EU (see also Nicolaides and Thomsen, 1991).…”
Section: A Review Of the Empirical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, if this hypothesis could be confirmed by statistical testing, it still remains to be explained why, for instance, the UK seems to be more attractive to these investors than Spain or Greece. Nicolaides and Thomsen (1991) rejecting protectionism as a motive for Japanese FDI, suggest that anti-dumping duties may have been a response to, rather than the cause of, Japanese FDI in the EU. In their view, the driving force behind Japanese FDI is more likely to be the proximity to the consumer rather than protectionism.…”
Section: A Review Of the Empirical Literaturementioning
“…lO In particular, voluntary export restraints in the automobile sector and the 1986 semiconductor trade agreement are shown to have induced sizable direct investment flows from Japan. Evidence on Japanese FDI to the European Union, however, has been less clearcut (Thomsen, 1993, Barrell and Pain, 1993, and Nicolaides and Thomsen, 1991.…”
Section: Ll Overview Of Past Movements In Foreign Direct Investmentsmentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.