2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.aop.2017.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can quantum probes satisfy the weak equivalence principle?

Abstract: We address the question whether quantum probes in a gravitational field can be considered as test particles obeying the weak equivalence principle (WEP). A formulation of the WEP is proposed which applies also in the quantum regime, while maintaining the physical content of its classical counterpart. Such formulation requires the introduction of a gravitational field not to modify the Fisher information about the mass of a freely-falling probe, extractable through measurements of its position. We discover that… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The uniform gravitational field induces a mass-dependent phase factor in Eq. (17). This mass-dependent phase factor however, is not present in the probability distribution, |ψ g (x, t)| 2 = |ψ free (x − gt 2 /2, t)| 2 .…”
Section: Static Uniform Gravitational Fieldmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The uniform gravitational field induces a mass-dependent phase factor in Eq. (17). This mass-dependent phase factor however, is not present in the probability distribution, |ψ g (x, t)| 2 = |ψ free (x − gt 2 /2, t)| 2 .…”
Section: Static Uniform Gravitational Fieldmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The evolution of a quantum particle is governed by the time-evolution operator U = e −i Ht . Taking the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff expansion of U to second-order, the time-evolution operator in a Schwarzschild field is (h = 1) [17] U ≈ exp imt 3 3…”
Section: Static Uniform Gravitational Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By free, we mean that the particle is affected only by the constraining potential that forces it to stay on the surface. The rationale behind this approach is that quantum systems are inherently sensitive to the parameters of their Hamiltonians, which may be exploited to precisely estimate the values of those parameters by performing suitable measurements on them [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. This idea has been recently exploited to develop a new approach to probe macroscopic systems, based on the quantification and optimisation of the information that can be extracted by an interacting quantum probe as opposed to a classical one.…”
Section: Sensing the Curvature By A Free Particlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, it is better to view UFF as a classical manifestation of WEP. On the contrary, WEP can still be safely guaranteed in quantum realm, especially constrained to NR region reduced [20][21] [43] from GR. Actually, WEP provides a key to "gauge away" the gravitational analogy of gauge potential, the first derivatives of metric tensor, i.e., ∂ ρ g µν ∼ Γ ρµν , thus is an essential ingredient to glue quantum matter (neglecting spin-gravity couplings) to the classical gravitational background.…”
Section: Relation To the Test Of The Equivalence Principlementioning
confidence: 99%