2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can reading-specific training stimuli improve the effect of perceptual learning on peripheral reading speed?

Abstract: In a previous study, Chung, Legge & Cheung (2004) showed that training using repeated presentation of trigrams (sequences of three random letters) resulted in an increase in the size of the visual span (number of letters recognized in a glance) and reading speed in the normal periphery. In this study, we asked whether we could optimize the benefit of trigram training on reading speed by using trigrams more specific to the reading task (i.e. trigrams frequently used in the English language) and presenting them … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
20
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This interpretation is compatible with the findings from studies in people with amblyopia [21], in normally sighted young adults [40][42], and even in people with central vision loss [43]. In our study, even without the mask, children with dyslexia exhibited more difficulty than control children when they were asked to process central letter and peripheral stimuli simultaneously [44].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This interpretation is compatible with the findings from studies in people with amblyopia [21], in normally sighted young adults [40][42], and even in people with central vision loss [43]. In our study, even without the mask, children with dyslexia exhibited more difficulty than control children when they were asked to process central letter and peripheral stimuli simultaneously [44].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…A similar training paradigm also robustly improved near VA in presbyopes, with no changes in the optics of the eye . Moreover, improvements following practice under crowded conditions were reported earlier in the periphery of normally sighted people (Bernard, Arunkumar, & Chung, 2012;Chung, 2007Chung, , 2011Hussain, Webb, Astle, & McGraw, 2012;Maniglia et al, 2011), in the fovea of people with amblyopia (Hussain et al, 2012;Levi & Klein, 1985a;Li, Provost, & Levi, 2007; for review see Levi & Li, 2009) and, recently, in the fovea of normally sighted people (Lev, Ludwig et al, 2014). The specificity of the training effects was found to depend on the amount of training (Huckauf & Nazir, 2007), and the training gains were generalized to untrained spatial separations after numerous trials (Chung, Li, & Levi, 2007 for review see Levi, 2008).…”
Section: Perceptual Learning In Visionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…However, there is increasing evidence indicating that also higher level cognitive processes are relevant (e.g. Huckauf, 2007;Huckauf and Nazir, 2007;Bernard et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%