2013
DOI: 10.1080/07347324.2013.800430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Recovery Capital Predict Addiction Problem Severity?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with social network theory, social capital and the effectiveness of family (Burns & Marks, 2013;Green et al 2013). Relationship difficulties with parents were cited as significant in the trajectory of substance use among this cohort, which is in keeping with existing, primarily quantitative, research among young people (Yabiku et al 2010;Stone et al 2012;Green et al 2013;Turner et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This is consistent with social network theory, social capital and the effectiveness of family (Burns & Marks, 2013;Green et al 2013). Relationship difficulties with parents were cited as significant in the trajectory of substance use among this cohort, which is in keeping with existing, primarily quantitative, research among young people (Yabiku et al 2010;Stone et al 2012;Green et al 2013;Turner et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Finally, social capital is the most robust resource for recovery. Burns and Marks (2013) suggested that social capital, in the context of recovery, refers to social relationships, family, access to sober outlets, and peers/social relationships that support individual recovery efforts. Using the recovery capital theoretical framework may help counselors understand how individuals are able to use personal and social resources in their efforts to overcome substance use (Cloud & Granfield, 2008).…”
Section: Recovery Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The practical and theoretical usefulness of RC has also been recognized in Sweden (Skogens, von Greiff, and Esch Ekström 2017;Skogens and von Greiff 2016;Topor, Skogens, and von Greiff 2018), suggesting that an assessment tool based on RC might be applicable in a Swedish treatment context, as it has been in other countries (Best et al 2016;Burns and Marks 2013;Groshkova, Best, and White 2013). The ability that has been found to identify crucial elements of an individual's recovery process, and by extension outlines an individual's barriers and strengths, also corresponds to the core of evidence-based practice, and mainly the increasing demands for documentation and assessment (The National Board of Health and Welfare 2019, 23) The paradoxical difficulty of applying standardized tools in the area of social work entails a challenge, where careful deliberations concerning applicability and demand are necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%