2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2020.102190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can regional aerial images from orthophoto surveys produce high quality photogrammetric Canopy Height Model? A single tree approach in Western Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To quantify shade from riparian vegetation, valley morphology and channel orientation, the ‘analytical hillshading’ method from SAGA ( Tarini, Cignoni & Montani, 2006 ) was used. Based on a digital elevation model (photogrammetric digital surface model derived from regional orthophoto survey from the year 2016 processed as described in Michez et al (2020) , grid resolution: 5 m × 5 m) and sun position, the tool calculates angles at which sunlight impinges on the surface. The values range between 0 and 90°, with 90° corresponding to an area in shadow.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantify shade from riparian vegetation, valley morphology and channel orientation, the ‘analytical hillshading’ method from SAGA ( Tarini, Cignoni & Montani, 2006 ) was used. Based on a digital elevation model (photogrammetric digital surface model derived from regional orthophoto survey from the year 2016 processed as described in Michez et al (2020) , grid resolution: 5 m × 5 m) and sun position, the tool calculates angles at which sunlight impinges on the surface. The values range between 0 and 90°, with 90° corresponding to an area in shadow.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, when using point clouds, it may be more difficult to do so with variables related to lower height percentiles, canopy closure or LAI (leaf area index) [76]. A third advantage of CHMs beyond ease of use and robustness is that it can be updated with photogrammetric point clouds once a first Li-DAR survey has been done [77]. The m1 model could thus be better suited to the use of time series or to the comparison of sites covered by different datasets. )…”
Section: Lidar Biomass Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example a canopy height model was one of many potential variables, but was not selected for the final classification model. There-fore, the applied classification model differs from remotely sensed based forest inventories, where the canopy height model typically plays a major role regardless of the underlying data sources [10,11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many relevant tree attributes vary seasonally in forests and, due to the important role of foliage cover [10,11], studies that primarily focus on such seasonally changing variables, can be considered particularly valuable to classify individual tree species. For example, Gara et al [12] showed that different leaf traits influence the results of tree species classification when using satellite images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%