2021
DOI: 10.1590/pboci.2021.098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Schoolchildren Substitute Mothers' Reports of Cariogenic Foods Consumption?

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the influence de two instruments for evaluation of cariogenic foods consumption by schoolchildren. Material and Methods: The convenience sample comprised of 30 active-caries children (7-10 years old) attended in a public dental clinic and their mothers, who have not received dietary orientation before study. A trained evaluator administered the Previous Day Food Questionnaire (PDFQ) to children and other examiner applied the 24-hour dietary recall with mothers. Internal consistency be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specific questions regarding the consumption of sweets, chocolates, biscuits, chips, salty snacks, packaged sweetened juices and soft drinks, donuts and other junk foods while watching screen devices were included in the questionnaire and considered cariogenic. This was based on their densities of refined sugar or other simple carbohydrates and/or previously reported associations with caries [20]. Bias was social desirability as participants were included in the study.…”
Section: Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific questions regarding the consumption of sweets, chocolates, biscuits, chips, salty snacks, packaged sweetened juices and soft drinks, donuts and other junk foods while watching screen devices were included in the questionnaire and considered cariogenic. This was based on their densities of refined sugar or other simple carbohydrates and/or previously reported associations with caries [20]. Bias was social desirability as participants were included in the study.…”
Section: Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%