2016
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1500171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can selection on a male mating character result in evolutionary change? A selection experiment on California wild radish, Raphanus sativus

Abstract: Our data suggest a genetic basis for pollen donor ability to sire seeds in competition. The significant response to selection in two replicates shows that position of seeds sired can respond to selection. Thus, all components for sexual selection to occur and affect traits are present. Variation in results among replicates might be due to changes in greenhouse conditions. Environmental effects may contribute to the maintenance of variation in these fitness-related characters.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 169 publications
(241 reference statements)
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent selection study in wild radish for three generations on the capacity of pollen to sire seeds either at the top or basal position of fruits, where the latter is associated with faster growing pollen tubes, resulted in evolution of more competitive pollen in plants generated from the basal fruit position in two out of four replicates (Marshall and Evans 2016). A difference between their study and the present study is that we did not select directly on pollen traits, but rather created an environment-protandry-that favored high early fertilization and fast pollen tube growth rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent selection study in wild radish for three generations on the capacity of pollen to sire seeds either at the top or basal position of fruits, where the latter is associated with faster growing pollen tubes, resulted in evolution of more competitive pollen in plants generated from the basal fruit position in two out of four replicates (Marshall and Evans 2016). A difference between their study and the present study is that we did not select directly on pollen traits, but rather created an environment-protandry-that favored high early fertilization and fast pollen tube growth rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the extent that pollen and sperm success reflects differences in their haploid genotypes, competition among these gametes/gametophytes is qualitatively distinct from selection among diploid males (Immler et al 2012). In plants, selection among haploid male gametophytes is thought to be pervasive (Skogsmyr and Lankinen 2002;Moore and Pannell 2011;Marshall and Evans 2016); in Arabidopsis, 60-70% of all genes are expressed during the haploid phase (Borg et al 2009), and pollen-expressed genes exhibit stronger signatures of purifying selection and positive selection (Arunkumar et al 2013;Gossmann et al 2014). For agricultural breeding, pollen has been exposed to a variety of selection pressures in vivo and in vitro, including temperature (Clarke et al 2004;Hedhly et al 2004), herbicides (Frascaroli and Songstad 2001), metals (Searcy and Mulcahy 1985), water stress (Ravikumar et al 2003), and pathogens (Ravikumar et al 2012), resulting in an increased frequency of beneficial genotypes among the diploid sporophytic offspring.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This context‐specific effect of pollen size on performance indicates that other factors, such as pollen–pistil interactions, pollen genotype × environment interactions, or other genetically based differences among pollen donors that influence pollen performance must also play a role in determining the outcome of these competitive interactions and in maintaining the high level of genetic variation in pollen grain size that made this elegant experiment possible in the first place. Marshall and Evans (2016 in this issue) also found a pollen size effect on pollen performance (see next section).…”
Section: What Specific Pollen Traits Affect Male Gametophyte Performamentioning
confidence: 72%