Can short-term high-intensity intermittent training reduce adiposity?

Panissa, Valéria Leme Gonçalves; Alves, Elaine Domingues; Salermo, Gabriela Pires; Franchini, Émerson; Takito, Mônica Yuri

doi:10.1007/s11332-016-0260-6

Cited by 23 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Panissa et al 90 used a 22 min protocol with 1 min at 90% and 30 s at 60% of HRmax. However, it seems again unfeasible for participants to achieve the prescribed intensity of effort based on the percentage of HRmax since both the times taken to increase and decrease HR seem too short.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is interval training the magic bullet for fat loss? A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing moderate-intensity continuous training with high-intensity interval training (HIIT)

Viana¹,

Naves²,

Coswig³

et al. 2019

Br J Sports Med

110

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesTo compare the effects of interval training and moderate-intensity continuous training (MOD) on body adiposity in humans, and to perform subgroup analyses that consider the type and duration of interval training in different groups.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesEnglish-language, Spanish-language and Portuguese-language searches of the electronic databases PubMed and Scopus were conducted from inception to 11 December 2017.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesStudies that met the following criteria were included: (1) original articles, (2) human trials, (3) minimum exercise training duration of 4 weeks, and (4) directly or indirectly compared interval training with MOD as the primary or secondary aim.ResultsOf the 786 studies found, 41 and 36 were included in the qualitative analysis and meta-analysis, respectively. Within-group analyses showed significant reductions in total body fat percentage (%) (interval training: −1.50 [95% CI −2.14 to −0.86, p<0.00001] and MOD: −1.44 [95% CI −2.00 to −0.89, p<0.00001]) and in total absolute fat mass (kg) (interval training: −1.58 [95% CI −2.74 to −0.43, p=0.007] and MOD: −1.13 [95% CI −2.18 to −0.08, p=0.04]), with no significant differences between interval training and MOD for total body fat percentage reduction (−0.23 [95% CI −1.43 to 0.97], p=0.705). However, there was a significant difference between the groups in total absolute fat mass (kg) reduction (−2.28 [95% CI −4.00 to −0.56], p=0.0094). Subgroup analyses comparing sprint interval training (SIT) with MOD protocols favour SIT for loss of total absolute fat mass (kg) (−3.22 [95% CI −5.71 to −0.73], p=0.01). Supervised training, walking/running/jogging, age (<30 years), study quality and intervention duration (<12 weeks) favourably influence the decreases in total absolute fat mass (kg) observed from interval training programmes; however, no significant effect was found on total body fat percentage (%). No effect of sex or body mass index was observed on total absolute fat mass (kg) or total body fat percentage (%).ConclusionInterval training and MOD both reduce body fat percentage (%). Interval training provided 28.5% greater reductions in total absolute fat mass (kg) than MOD.Trial registration numberCRD42018089427.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is interval training the magic bullet for fat loss? A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing moderate-intensity continuous training with high-intensity interval training (HIIT)

Viana¹,

Naves²,

Coswig³

et al. 2019

Br J Sports Med

110

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition to the analysis of the effectiveness of HIIT for changes in body composition, an objective of many investigations has been to compare the effectiveness of the HIIT and MICT methods and to identify the best strategy (15,17,(19)(20)(21)28,29,38,44,51,53,(58)(59)(60)64,(66)(67)(68)74). In this present study, the analyses showed that HIIT is similar to MICT for reducing body fat percentage, opposing the findings of the meta-analysis by Türk et al (26) that revealed the superiority of HIIT (À2.01% [95% CI: À3.75% to À0.30%]) in adults with obesity.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The influence of high‐intensity interval training on anthropometric variables of adults with overweight or obesity: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary Objective The goal of this study was to evaluate the influence of high‐intensity interval training (HIIT) on anthropometric variables in adults afflicted with overweight or obesity and to compare the effects with those of moderate‐intensity continuous training. Methods A computer literature search was performed for HIIT intervention studies that evaluated anthropometric variables in adults afflicted with overweight or obesity. Results Of the 857 articles retrieved in the electronic search, 48 met the inclusion criteria. The analyses demonstrated that HIIT was effective in decreasing body mass (−1.45 kg [95% CI: −1.85 to −1.05 kg]), body mass index (−0.44 kg m−2 [95% CI: −0.59 to −0.30 kg m−2]), waist circumference (−2.3 cm [95% CI: −3.1 to −1.4 cm]), waist/hip ratio (−0.01 [95% CI: −0.02 to −0.00]), body fat percentage (−1.29% [95% CI: −1.70% to −0.87%]) and abdominal visceral fat area (−6.83 cm2 [95% CI: −11.95 to −1.71 cm2]). When considering equalization between the two methods (energy expenditure or workload matched), no differences were found in any measure except body mass (for which HIIT was superior). Conclusions High‐intensity interval training and moderate‐intensity continuous training results were similar, particularly when equalization between the two methods was considered. Thus, HIIT can be used as a secondary method for the treatment of obesity in adults.

show abstract

“…High intensity interval training and all-out maximum effort or capacity have been used to promote weight loss, glycemic control and increases in aerobic fitness (Burgomaster et al, 2008; Gibala et al, 2012; Little et al, 2011; Panissa et al, 2016). However, all-out exercise needs specific equipment (cycloergometer, i.e., mechanically braked bicycle ergometer, or if performed outdoors, a field or running track), and may be unattainable for some populations, limiting its feasibility.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Physiological Acute Response to High-Intensity Intermittent and Moderate-Intensity Continuous 5 km Running Performance: Implications for Training Prescription

Cabral-Santos

Gerosa-Neto

Inoue

et al. 2017

Journal of Human Kinetics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Can short-term high-intensity intermittent training reduce adiposity?

Cited by 23 publications

References 26 publications

Is interval training the magic bullet for fat loss? A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing moderate-intensity continuous training with high-intensity interval training (HIIT)

Is interval training the magic bullet for fat loss? A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing moderate-intensity continuous training with high-intensity interval training (HIIT)

The influence of high‐intensity interval training on anthropometric variables of adults with overweight or obesity: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis

Physiological Acute Response to High-Intensity Intermittent and Moderate-Intensity Continuous 5 km Running Performance: Implications for Training Prescription

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About