2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.mran.2017.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can stochastic consumer phase models in QMRA be simplified to a single factor?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently no such data unique to sheep meat is available, and it was felt that consumer cooking processes for sheep meat are likely to differ greatly to other meat products. Neves et al (2018) find that such simplifications of the consumer phase can often result in an overestimation of the impact of consumer interventions, suggesting that the posterior distributions of p hc and p hh may be somewhat overestimates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Currently no such data unique to sheep meat is available, and it was felt that consumer cooking processes for sheep meat are likely to differ greatly to other meat products. Neves et al (2018) find that such simplifications of the consumer phase can often result in an overestimation of the impact of consumer interventions, suggesting that the posterior distributions of p hc and p hh may be somewhat overestimates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Several dose‒response models for NTS have been developed based on different types of data and assumptions. In the present study, the beta‐Poisson dose–response model from the FAO/WHO was employed to describe the probability of infection from an ingested dose D of NTS, as described by the following equation (FAO/WHO, 2002): Pillbadbreak=1goodbreak−1+Dβfalse(αfalse),$$\begin{equation}{\rm{Pill}} = 1 - {\left(1 + \frac{D}{\beta }\right)^{( - \alpha )}},\end{equation}$$where Pill represents the probability of illness for an individual exposed to a dose ( D ) and α and β are the parameters of the beta‐Poisson distribution, with α = 0.1324 and β = 51.45, respectively (Neves et al., 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Pill represents the probability of illness for an individual exposed to a dose (D) and α and β are the parameters of the beta-Poisson distribution, with α = 0.1324 and β = 51.45, respectively (Neves et al, 2018).…”
Section: Dose-response Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Havelaar and Swart (2014) analyzed the dose–response models in microbial risk assessment with a focus on the “missing link” between infection and illness; they observed that current microbial risk assessment models do not take into account acquired immunity which may lead to biased risk estimates. Therefore, the consumer model presents many challenges due to the high variability of the food handling behavior in domestic and commercial settings, because consumers' food safety practices cannot be enforced by legislation (MacRitchie, Hunter, & Strachan, 2014; Neves, Mungai, & Nauta, 2018) and lack of information related to previous exposures to low doses and acquired immunity. Another anticipated challenge for future risk assessment is the characterization of Campylobacter ‐associated human risk, which requires more research focusing on the dose–response models applicable to different consumers' groups ( e.g ., vulnerable populations) and the role and effects of acquired immunity in humans.…”
Section: The Disease Burden Of Campylobacter‐associated Human Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%