2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can students really multitask? An experimental study of instant messaging while reading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

8
165
2
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 313 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
8
165
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…25 In addition, studies from the psychology and education literature have previously documented negative consequences on learning when individuals use electronic devices to multitask. [15][16][17] Students who used a laptop in class were likely to multitask, become distracted, and distract others; the more a student used the laptop in class, the lower the student's class performance. 15 Multitasking with a cellphone during driving can be especially hazardous.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…25 In addition, studies from the psychology and education literature have previously documented negative consequences on learning when individuals use electronic devices to multitask. [15][16][17] Students who used a laptop in class were likely to multitask, become distracted, and distract others; the more a student used the laptop in class, the lower the student's class performance. 15 Multitasking with a cellphone during driving can be especially hazardous.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies from the psychology and traffic safety fields have documented untoward consequences when individuals use electronic devices to multitask. [15][16][17][18][19] Given these concerns, we investigated the prevalence and patterns of smartphone use during inpatient attending rounds, and whether these devices can distract team members in this period of important information transfer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Bowman, Levine, Waite, and Dendron (2010) found that students, who were chatting via instant messenger while reading a passage from a textbook took significantly more time to read the passage than students who were engaging in the reading task alone. Similarly, reading comprehension and memory have been shown to be significantly reduced in students completing academic work while watching television (Armstrong, Boiarsky, & Mares, 1991;Pool, Koolstra, & van der Voort, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were also more likely to be multitasking while doing homework. Given that experimental research by Bowman et al (2010) found that students took longer to read a passage of text online if they were simultaneously instant messaging, one possible explanation for why high school girls, especially those in the earlier cohort, spent longer on homework is that they spent more time multitasking with TV and computers for personal pleasure than did boys. Thus, longer time spent on homework may not necessarily translate into a greater quantity of homework completed or higher quality homework.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%