2012
DOI: 10.1080/09638199.2012.717103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can tariff and tax reforms deliver welfare improvements under imperfect competition?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We hypothesize that tax reform could have an effect on the real exchange rate through the trade openness channel. However, before laying out the arguments supporting the effect of the tax reform through the trade openness channel, it is important to note that tax reform (particularly a revenue-neutral tariff-tax reform) could also have an effect on the real exchange through other channels, 3) such as the domestic output (e.g., Ganelli and Tervala, 2015;Michael et al, 1993;Ligthart, 2002, 2005;Karakosta and Tsakiris, 2014;Kreickemeier and Raimondos-Møller, 2008;Naito, 2006), which include the Keynesian expenditure-switching effect of a nominal exchange rate change when prices are stagnant (Ganelli and Tervala, 2015). Then, we discussed how the effect of tax reform on the real exchange rate could materialize through this channel.…”
Section: Theoretical Discussion On the Effect Of Tax Reform On The Re...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hypothesize that tax reform could have an effect on the real exchange rate through the trade openness channel. However, before laying out the arguments supporting the effect of the tax reform through the trade openness channel, it is important to note that tax reform (particularly a revenue-neutral tariff-tax reform) could also have an effect on the real exchange through other channels, 3) such as the domestic output (e.g., Ganelli and Tervala, 2015;Michael et al, 1993;Ligthart, 2002, 2005;Karakosta and Tsakiris, 2014;Kreickemeier and Raimondos-Møller, 2008;Naito, 2006), which include the Keynesian expenditure-switching effect of a nominal exchange rate change when prices are stagnant (Ganelli and Tervala, 2015). Then, we discussed how the effect of tax reform on the real exchange rate could materialize through this channel.…”
Section: Theoretical Discussion On the Effect Of Tax Reform On The Re...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a reduction of implicit production subsidies (due to declining tariffs) would allow efficient allocation of resources in the production sector, generate welfare gains, and also increase public revenue. The literature on the tariff-tax reform has usually investigated the effect of tariff-tax reform on market access, public revenue, and welfare (e.g., Fujiwara 2013, Hatzipanayotou et al 1994, Keen and Ligthart 2002, Kreickemeier and Raimondos-Møller 2008, Karakosta and Tsakiris 2014. Specifically, the literature on the effect of tariff-tax reform on market access (defined as the value of import volumes at the world price) has usually focused on one specific tariff-tax reform that involves a one-unit tariff reduction and an increase in consumption tax by one unit, as advised by international financial institutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies have focused on perfectly competitive product markets and have shown that a tariff reduction, combined with an increase in consumption taxes, improves welfare and government revenue. However, under imperfect competition, although there are a few cases where the same tariff–tax reforms improve welfare (Naito and Abe, ; Karakosta and Tsakiris, ), the compensation of government revenue losses under these reforms usually comes at the cost of national welfare (Keen and Ligthart, ). Such welfare‐reducing tariff–tax reforms under imperfect competition give rise to doubts about their applicability as a policy and raise the following questions: (1) Does a tariff reduction with no other tax reform, such as a consumption tax, inevitably lead to loss in government revenue under imperfect competition?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%