2022
DOI: 10.3389/frsfm.2022.914494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can the Concentration of a Transcription Factor Affect Gene Expression?

Abstract: DNA is the ultimate molecule that encodes life through genes. Genes positioned along the meter-long DNA molecule have to be expressed at the right time and in the right amount via strict regulatory processes. Regulation of a gene starts with the binding of a DNA-binding protein known as a transcription factor (TF) to a target regulatory element along the double-stranded DNA molecule. Often, TFs attach to DNA in a sequence-specific manner and can target DNA motifs of various lengths, yet some TFs can also inter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We compared TFBS enrichment to the corresponding TF expression, finding several TFs to be both differentially expressed and enriched in chromatin accessible regions ( Extended Data Fig.3d ). However, we did not find statistically significant correlation (r > 0.5, Pearson correlation) between TF expression and motif enrichment, possibly as TF concentration is not the sole determinants of DNA binding 89 . However, a small number of TFs which had enriched TFBS in a cluster-specific manner had high expression in the corresponding clusters.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We compared TFBS enrichment to the corresponding TF expression, finding several TFs to be both differentially expressed and enriched in chromatin accessible regions ( Extended Data Fig.3d ). However, we did not find statistically significant correlation (r > 0.5, Pearson correlation) between TF expression and motif enrichment, possibly as TF concentration is not the sole determinants of DNA binding 89 . However, a small number of TFs which had enriched TFBS in a cluster-specific manner had high expression in the corresponding clusters.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 87%
“…3d). However, we did not find statistically significant correlation (r > 0.5, Pearson correlation) between TF expression and motif enrichment, possibly as TF concentration is not the sole determinants of DNA binding 89 . However, a small number of TFs which had enriched TFBS in a cluster-specific manner had high expression in the corresponding clusters.…”
Section: Motif Enrichment Analyses Identify Cell-type Specific Regula...contrasting
confidence: 87%
“…The Caco2 cells display a wider distribution of the CD133 expression level than the HT-29 and HUH7 cells ( Figure 1 ), allowing the detection of even minor changes in the CD133 expression. The downregulation of TRIM28 by shRNA did not affect CD133 expression, suggesting that even a decreased amount of TRIM28 could maintain the CD133 level, as was shown for some other transcription factors that could activate transcription at very low concentrations [ 56 , 57 ]. The difference in the effects of large and small amounts of certain transcription factors on target genes expression was also demonstrated in vivo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It is therefore noteworthy that we observed a consistent species-wide trend of nonadditive expression leading to the relative gene-expression level in F1 hybrids being more similar to the low-expression parents. With the proviso that we cannot rule out that the absolute transcript abundance of these genes were in fact increasing, our measurements do indicate a relative decrease in cellular transcript concentration, which could have consequences for molecular interactions (Gao et al 2021;Koşar and Erbaş 2022). The abundance of up-stream rare alleles in these non-additively expressed genes further suggests that the change of expression had a genetic basis, as opposed to being merely a consequence of a common phenotype.…”
Section: Non-additivity In Arabidopsismentioning
confidence: 73%