2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10209-018-0611-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can the crowd tell how I feel? Trait empathy and ethnic background in a visual pain judgment task

Abstract: Many advocate for artificial agents to be empathic. Crowdsourcing could help, by facilitating human-in-the-loop approaches and data set creation for visual emotion recognition algorithms. Although crowdsourcing has been employed successfully for a range of tasks, it is not clear how effective crowdsourcing is when the task involves subjective rating of emotions. We examined relationships between demographics, empathy, and ethnic identity in pain emotion recognition tasks. Amazon MTurkers viewed images of stran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 63 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, we found systematic differences between responses of women and men contributors, which is in line not only with theory but also other recent findings on the crowdsourcing of image annotation. For instance, Matsangidou and colleagues (Matsangidou et al 2018) asked workers to describe images of people depicted in painful situations, as well as to evaluate their own levels of emotional arousal. While men and women reported similar levels of arousal when viewing the images, as well as comparable levels of confidence in the accuracy of their work, significant qualitative differences in the words used to describe the images were reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, we found systematic differences between responses of women and men contributors, which is in line not only with theory but also other recent findings on the crowdsourcing of image annotation. For instance, Matsangidou and colleagues (Matsangidou et al 2018) asked workers to describe images of people depicted in painful situations, as well as to evaluate their own levels of emotional arousal. While men and women reported similar levels of arousal when viewing the images, as well as comparable levels of confidence in the accuracy of their work, significant qualitative differences in the words used to describe the images were reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%