2004
DOI: 10.1080/14735780410001686469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can the Dead Speak to Us? De Man, Levinas and Agamben

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Death removes the ability of the deceased to speak directly to us (Davis 2004), but suicide is a form of death that challenges our ontological security (Seale 1998) and this, arguably, creates a need for meaning that drives a desire for continued dialogue with the deceased. Suicide research is a direct response to this need.…”
Section: Social Construction Of Documentary Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Death removes the ability of the deceased to speak directly to us (Davis 2004), but suicide is a form of death that challenges our ontological security (Seale 1998) and this, arguably, creates a need for meaning that drives a desire for continued dialogue with the deceased. Suicide research is a direct response to this need.…”
Section: Social Construction Of Documentary Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Se Agamben menciona os doentes mentais e os loucos, a função que eles ocupam no texto é de uma espécie de espectro que, no seu esquema de valoração das vidas, estariam, paradoxalmente, aquém dos muselmann, pois sequer tiveram espaço para articular -mesmo pelas palavras daquele que escreve -algo como um testemunho. Embora Agamben remeta a impossibilidade do testemunho aos muselmann, já foi observado que o autor, em O que resta de Auschwitz, em certo sentido, fala por eles (Davis, 2004) -e seu livro ainda termina com testemunhos escritos de alguns desses muselmann, mesmo que os relatos estejam relacionados à dificuldade de testemunhar.…”
Section: Epílogo: a Comunicabilidadeunclassified
“…Etymologically derived from two Greek words-prosopon (face or mask) and poiein (making)-prosopopoeia refers to a form of personification, or "making a thing act like a person as a fiction or disguise" (Johnson, 2008, p. 12). This trope has a wide range of rhetorical uses and effects: It can work as an act of mourning and testimony, keeping its focus on the past as it strives to bring the dead back to life and restore that which is irretrievably lost (De Man, 1979;Davis, 2004;Derrida, 1986, pp. 25-29;Keenan, 2018).…”
Section: Improper Personifications At the Margins Of Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%