1999
DOI: 10.1080/13607869956217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can the Drinking Problem Index provide valuable therapeutic information for recovering alcoholic adults?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Items tap problematic drinking behavior (e.g., being intoxicated or drunk after drinking), adverse drinking consequences (e.g., having a fall or accident as a result of drinking), and alcohol dependence or withdrawal symptoms (e.g., having early morning cravings for a drink). Construct validity is supported by significant associations with prior history of alcohol misuse and treatment for alcohol abuse (Bamberger, Sonnenstuhl, & Vashdi, 2006; Finney et al, 1991; Kopera-Frye, Wiscott, & Sterns, 1999). At baseline, 48% of participants reported no drinking problems (score = 0), and 52% of participants reported one-or-more drinking problems (score = 1).…”
Section: 1 Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Items tap problematic drinking behavior (e.g., being intoxicated or drunk after drinking), adverse drinking consequences (e.g., having a fall or accident as a result of drinking), and alcohol dependence or withdrawal symptoms (e.g., having early morning cravings for a drink). Construct validity is supported by significant associations with prior history of alcohol misuse and treatment for alcohol abuse (Bamberger, Sonnenstuhl, & Vashdi, 2006; Finney et al, 1991; Kopera-Frye, Wiscott, & Sterns, 1999). At baseline, 48% of participants reported no drinking problems (score = 0), and 52% of participants reported one-or-more drinking problems (score = 1).…”
Section: 1 Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Items were dichotomized (yes/no) and, following Brennan and Moos (1990), individuals who endorsed two or more items were considered to have drinking problems. Construct validity is supported by significant associations with prior history of alcohol misuse and treatment for alcohol abuse (Finney et al, 1991; Kopera-Frye, Wiscott, & Sterns, 1999). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DPI has high internal consistency (α = .94), good construct validity (Brennan & Moos, 1990; Finney et al, 1991; Kopera-Frye, Wiscott, & Sterns, 1999), and acceptable sensitivity and specificity for identification of late-middle-aged and older adults who have problems with alcohol (Bamberger, Sonnenstuhl, & Vashdi, 2006). Individuals were identified as having drinking problems if, at baseline assessment they endorsed one or more items from the DPI (0 = no drinking problems, 1 = one or more drinking problems).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%