2012
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61855-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can the Dutch Government really be abandoning smokers to their fate?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Smoking rates are higher and declines have been slower in the Netherlands than in the UK and Ireland 52 53 54 , where important perinatal health benefits of smoking bans have been described 11 13 17 . As the health impact of smoke-free legislation is thought to rely in part on norm spreading towards areas not typically covered, such as the home environment and private vehicles 55 56 , the relatively low proportion of Dutch smokers as opposed to smokers from other countries who consider SHS to be harmful to others and who worry about these effects, is of particular concern 57 58 . These figures suggest that at least part of the relative lack of impact of the Dutch smoke-free laws may be due to its lack of enforcement and compliance, although we cannot draw firm conclusions due to additional differences in study design, data collection methods, and population characteristics as compared to other studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smoking rates are higher and declines have been slower in the Netherlands than in the UK and Ireland 52 53 54 , where important perinatal health benefits of smoking bans have been described 11 13 17 . As the health impact of smoke-free legislation is thought to rely in part on norm spreading towards areas not typically covered, such as the home environment and private vehicles 55 56 , the relatively low proportion of Dutch smokers as opposed to smokers from other countries who consider SHS to be harmful to others and who worry about these effects, is of particular concern 57 58 . These figures suggest that at least part of the relative lack of impact of the Dutch smoke-free laws may be due to its lack of enforcement and compliance, although we cannot draw firm conclusions due to additional differences in study design, data collection methods, and population characteristics as compared to other studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An accompanying media campaign should explain that smoke-free legislation is implemented to protect non-smokers from exposure to secondhand smoke instead of only stimulating smoking cessation [26,27]. This is specifically important in the Netherlands, were smokers are less knowledgeable or concerned about the harms of smoking and second-hand smoke than in other countries [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent disinvestment in tobacco control, as seen in the Netherlands where government reversed their decision to reimburse a Stop Smoking programme through health insurance, weakened the smoke-free laws, cancelled mass media campaigns and withdrew funding, 22 raises fear that the deepening economic crisis and public sector cuts might derail tobacco control efforts in Ireland. However, planned implementation of pictorial health warnings on tobacco packages in 2013, the launch of a new multifaceted media campaigndthe QUIT campaigndand further tax increases in the recent budget despite warnings from the tobacco industry 23 and a report by the Revenue Commission 24 suggest that the Irish Government is still committed to continued progress in tobacco control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%