2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.08.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can the intra-examiner variability of Little's Irregularity Index be improved using 3D digital models of study casts?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies described an excellent reproducibility for digital measurements in DDM and CBCT. 10,20,27,[31][32][33][34] The results from this present study confirm those findings for 3D dental linear displacements with similar values for DDM and CBCT methods, as measured at the mesiobuccal cusp of the first molars, canine tip and incisal surface of the incisors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies described an excellent reproducibility for digital measurements in DDM and CBCT. 10,20,27,[31][32][33][34] The results from this present study confirm those findings for 3D dental linear displacements with similar values for DDM and CBCT methods, as measured at the mesiobuccal cusp of the first molars, canine tip and incisal surface of the incisors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…19,21,22 Therefore, methodologies that can offer an alternative for the CBCT examination started to be proposed. DDMs show an accurate 3D image of the clinical crown and are reliable for measuring tooth size, arch dimensions and irregularity index [31][32][33][34] and some recent works even suggested the prediction of root position from it. 11,23,24 However, when comparing the changes in mesiodistal and buccolingual angulation using the clinical crown (DDM) and the whole tooth (CBCT), the present study showed that the results were significantly different for most of the variables assessed (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this index can be influenced greatly by a single tooth and may not detect vertical Angle Orthodontist, Vol 88, No 3, 2018 discrepancies, it is traditionally applied to this type of study. 13,14 Transverse widths of the digital models were measured by a dentist rater who was blinded as to which wire was used in each patient. Canine measurements were made from cusp tip to cusp tip, and molar measurements were made from central fossa to central fossa.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of digital models has many advantages over plaster models: handling and storage are easier; measurements are faster; and data can be transferred directly to another electronic database, eliminating possible errors due to manual transcription. In addition, measurements made on plaster models and digital models were proved to be equally accurate ( 19 , 20 ), whereas other authors found digital models even more accurate and reproducible ( 21 ). This was confirmed by the excellent intra-rater agreement found in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%